Monday, February 25, 2019

Better Buy: Costco vs. Walmart

The relentless growth of e-commerce has wiped away a huge swath of the traditional retail industry in recent years. Yet not every retailer will succumb to this unfortunate fate.

For example, Costco Wholesale (NASDAQ:COST) and Walmart (NYSE:WMT) have found ways to not just survive, but thrive in this intensely competitive environment, and they've delivered solid gains to their investors along the way.

But which of these retail giants' stock is the best buy now for investors? Let's compare them on a few key fronts.

Strategy

Walmart has wisely prioritized its e-commerce and omnichannel initiatives in recent years. It acquired Jet.com in 2016, and shortly thereafter placed the online retail upstart's founder and CEO, Marc Lore, at the helm of its e-commerce operations. Since then, Walmart has broadened its online selection, improved its free shipping options, and strengthened its fulfillment network.

A computer keyboard button labeled add to cart

Walmart is adapting to the e-commerce revolution better than perhaps any other big box retailer. Image source: Getty Images.

Walmart also positioned its industry-leading grocery business at the core of its omnichannel strategy. By steadily rolling out grocery pickup across its massive store base, and expanding its delivery offerings, Walmart has sought to add more value and offer more convenience to store-goers and online shoppers alike.

Together, these tactics have fueled solid gains in Walmart's e-commerce sales, while also helping to drive traffic and boost sales at its stores.

Costco, in contrast, has maintained a laser-like focus on its in-store operations. The warehouse store operator derives the majority of its profit from membership fees; that model allows it to offer goods at prices that even online competitors find difficult to match. Costco also limits its selection and changes it often. This creates a treasure hunt-type shopping experience that helps to drive strong repeat traffic to its stores.

All told, Costco is one of the best run traditional retailers -- if not the best. But Walmart's heavy e-commerce investments reflect a more forward-thinking approach. And with retail sales increasingly migrating to online channels, its leadership in this area is likely to be an important competitive edge in the years ahead.

Advantage: Walmart

Financial strength

Metric

Costco Wholesale

Walmart 

Revenue

$144.8 billion 

$514.4 billion

Operating income

$4.5 billion 

$22 billion

Operating cash flow

$5.9 billion 

$27.8 billion

Free cash flow

$3.1 billion 

$17.4 billion

Cash & investments

$8 billion 

$7.7 billion

Debt

$6.5 billion 

$58 billion 

Data sources: Morningstar, company filings.

Costco clearly has the stronger balance sheet, with $1.5 billion in net cash compared to Walmart's $51 billion in net debt. However, Walmart generated more than five times as much free cash flow as Costco in the past year. This strong cash production allows Walmart to easily service its debt while simultaneously rewarding investors with bountiful dividends and share repurchases. And if it chose to, Walmart could pay down its debt over time. As such, Walmart has the edge here.

Advantage: Walmart

Growth

Walmart may be the superior cash generator, but Costco is growing much more rapidly. Over the past five years, Costco's revenue, operating cash flow, and free cash flow growth have all drastically exceeded those of Walmart.

COST Revenue (TTM) Chart

COST Revenue (TTM) data by YCharts

Moreover, Costco's sales and profit growth are likely to continue to surpass Walmart's in the coming years.

Wall Street expects Costco's revenue to rise by 8% in 2019 and 6.7% in 2020,  fueled by new store openings and strong same-store sales growth. Additionally, analysts estimate that Costco's earnings per share will increase by 10.6% annually  over the next five years, driven by continued growth in its membership fees.

Walmart, meanwhile, is projected to grow its sales by less than 3% both this year and next,  as it focuses more on store remodels rather than new openings.  Moreover, Walmart's EPS is forecast to rise by less than 4% annually over the next half-decade, as its e-commerce investments continue to weigh on its profitability.

Advantage: Costco

Valuation

Metric

Costco Wholesale

Walmart

Price-to-Sales Ratio

0.66 

0.56 

Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio

31.07 

16.61 

Forward Price-to-Earnings Ratio

25.84 

19.87 

Data source: Yahoo! Finance.

Across all three of these common valuation metrics, Walmart's shares are significantly less expensive than those of Costco. This is to be somewhat expected, given Costco's higher expected earnings growth rate. Still, Walmart's stock is currently 47% and 23% cheaper based on free cash flow and expected earnings, respectively. That makes it the better bargain. 

Advantage: Walmart 

The winner is...

Costco may be growing faster, but Walmart's e-commerce success, superior cash flow production, and more attractively priced stock make it the better investment today.

Sunday, February 24, 2019

Hot High Tech Stocks To Buy Right Now

tags:RF,EEM,SMTC, &l;p&g;&l;img class=&q;dam-image getty size-large wp-image-84279510&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/84279510/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;614&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Accused $50 billion Ponzi scheme swindler Bernard Madoff (right) enters federal court January 14, 2009 in New York City. Madoff was accused of running a Ponzi scheme through his investment company. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images).

With the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announcing the unsealing of fraud charges against a Mississippi company and its principal who allegedly &a;ldquo;bilked at least&a;rdquo; 150 investors in an $85 million&a;nbsp;&l;a href=&q;https://www.investor.gov/additional-resources/general-resources/glossary/ponzi-schemes&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Ponzi scheme&l;/a&g;, it provides a reminder that such fraudulent investment scams are never far away and investors should watch out.

So named after&a;nbsp;Charles Ponzi, who duped investors back in the 1920s with a postage stamp speculation scheme that collected over $8 million from around 30,000 investors, Ponzi schemes were brought into sharp focus with&a;nbsp;&l;a href=&q;https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernard_Madoff&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Bernard Madoff&l;/a&g;&a;nbsp;a decade ago in the late &a;ldquo;noughties&a;rdquo;, when he revealed his investments were &a;ldquo;all one big lie.&a;rdquo;

Hot High Tech Stocks To Buy Right Now: Regions Financial Corporation(RF)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Regions Financial (RF)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Regions Financial (RF)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    ValuEngine downgraded shares of Regions Financial (NYSE:RF) from a buy rating to a hold rating in a report published on Friday morning.

    Several other equities research analysts also recently weighed in on the stock. Keefe, Bruyette & Woods reaffirmed a neutral rating on shares of Regions Financial in a research note on Sunday, April 22nd. B. Riley upped their target price on shares of Regions Financial from $19.00 to $20.00 and gave the stock a neutral rating in a research note on Tuesday, April 24th. Three equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, fifteen have issued a hold rating, four have given a buy rating and two have assigned a strong buy rating to the company’s stock. The company currently has an average rating of Hold and a consensus price target of $17.56.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Regions Financial (RF)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Regions Financial (RF)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Hot High Tech Stocks To Buy Right Now: iShares MSCI Emerging Markets (EEM)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Cabot Wealth Management Inc. raised its stake in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA:EEM) by 10.3% during the first quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund owned 31,676 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock after buying an additional 2,946 shares during the quarter. Cabot Wealth Management Inc.’s holdings in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF were worth $1,529,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Summit X LLC boosted its position in shares of iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA:EEM) by 15.6% during the 2nd quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The institutional investor owned 9,837 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock after acquiring an additional 1,325 shares during the period. Summit X LLC’s holdings in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF were worth $429,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

  • [By ]

    In the first three months of the year, Bridgewater unloaded more than $2 billion worth of shares in three big emerging market ETFs: the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM), its cheaper counterpart the iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG), and the Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The combined 45 million shares were the largest sales by the money manager in the period.

  • [By ]

    The MSCI Emerging Market Index is positing an incredible run. It's on its longest-ever streak without a 10% decline, Bloomberg notes. That's helping power the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSE:EEM) well ahead of the S&P 500 to start the year.

  • [By Jim Crumly]

    Materials stocks rebounded from a fall yesterday, with the SPDR S&P Metals and Mining ETF (NYSEMKT:XME) closing up 2%. Emerging markets also bounced back, thanks in part to a weakening dollar; the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEMKT:EEM) rose 1.9%.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    First Trust Advisors LP purchased a new stake in shares of iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (NYSEARCA:EEM) in the second quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The institutional investor purchased 17,676 shares of the exchange traded fund’s stock, valued at approximately $766,000.

Hot High Tech Stocks To Buy Right Now: Semtech Corporation(SMTC)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Benzinga News Desk]

    The wealthy are hoarding $10 billion of bitcoin in bunkers: Link $

    ECONOMIC DATA US May MBA mortgage applications -0.4% vs, -2.5% prior USA Core PPI (MoM) for Apr 0.20% vs 0.20% Est; Prior 0.30%. USA PPI (MoM) for Apr 0.10% vs 0.20% Est; Prior 0.30% Data on wholesale trade inventories for March will be released at 10:00 a.m. ET. The Energy Information Administration’s weekly report on petroleum inventories in the U.S. is schedule for release at 10:30 a.m. ET. The Treasury is set to auction 10-year notes at 1:00 p.m. ET. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta President Raphael Bostic is set to speak at 1:15 p.m. ET. ANALYST RATINGS Cantor upgraded Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: ARWR) from Neutral to Overweight RBC upgraded Semtech (NASDAQ: SMTC) from Sector Perform to Outperform Morgan Stanley downgraded Adient (NYSE: ADNT) from Overweight to Equal-Weight Jefferies downgraded Beacon Roofing (NASDAQ: BECN) from Buy to Hold

    This is a tool used by the Benzinga News Desk each trading day — it's a look at everything happening in the market, in five minutes. To get the full version of this note every morning, click here.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Semtech Co. (NASDAQ:SMTC) – Investment analysts at Oppenheimer issued their Q3 2020 earnings estimates for shares of Semtech in a research note issued to investors on Thursday, May 31st. Oppenheimer analyst R. Schafer anticipates that the semiconductor company will post earnings per share of $0.45 for the quarter. Oppenheimer currently has a “Outperform” rating and a $50.00 price target on the stock. Oppenheimer also issued estimates for Semtech’s Q4 2020 earnings at $0.44 EPS.

  • [By Motley Fool Transcription]

    Semtech Corporation (NASDAQ:SMTC)Q2 2019 Earnings Conference CallAug. 29, 2018, 5:00 p.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Semtech (NASDAQ:SMTC)‘s stock had its “overweight” rating reaffirmed by equities researchers at Piper Jaffray Companies in a report released on Monday, The Fly reports. They presently have a $57.00 price target on the semiconductor company’s stock. Piper Jaffray Companies’ price target would indicate a potential upside of 12.98% from the stock’s current price.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Semtech Co. (NASDAQ:SMTC) VP Marc Pegulu sold 500 shares of the firm’s stock in a transaction on Friday, July 6th. The shares were sold at an average price of $48.85, for a total value of $24,425.00. Following the completion of the sale, the vice president now owns 15,453 shares in the company, valued at $754,879.05. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is accessible through this hyperlink.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Semtech Co. (NASDAQ:SMTC) SVP James Jungsup Kim sold 8,617 shares of Semtech stock in a transaction on Tuesday, September 18th. The stock was sold at an average price of $60.00, for a total value of $517,020.00. Following the completion of the transaction, the senior vice president now owns 54,842 shares in the company, valued at $3,290,520. The sale was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through this hyperlink.

Friday, February 22, 2019

Lakeland Bancorp (LBAI) Upgraded to Sell by BidaskClub

Lakeland Bancorp (NASDAQ:LBAI) was upgraded by research analysts at BidaskClub from a “strong sell” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note issued to investors on Wednesday.

LBAI has been the subject of several other research reports. Zacks Investment Research lowered Lakeland Bancorp from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Saturday, January 12th. FIG Partners upgraded Lakeland Bancorp from a “market perform” rating to an “outperform” rating and set a $20.00 target price for the company in a research report on Friday, October 26th. Three investment analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, one has given a hold rating and three have given a buy rating to the company. Lakeland Bancorp has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $19.88.

Get Lakeland Bancorp alerts:

Shares of LBAI traded up $0.20 during mid-day trading on Wednesday, hitting $16.96. The stock had a trading volume of 85,012 shares, compared to its average volume of 135,715. The firm has a market cap of $795.93 million, a price-to-earnings ratio of 12.66 and a beta of 0.85. The company has a current ratio of 0.96, a quick ratio of 0.96 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.48. Lakeland Bancorp has a fifty-two week low of $13.77 and a fifty-two week high of $21.20.

Lakeland Bancorp (NASDAQ:LBAI) last issued its earnings results on Monday, January 28th. The financial services provider reported $0.35 EPS for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $0.34 by $0.01. The company had revenue of $49.83 million during the quarter, compared to analyst estimates of $49.63 million. Lakeland Bancorp had a return on equity of 10.78% and a net margin of 26.93%. On average, sell-side analysts predict that Lakeland Bancorp will post 1.37 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

In related news, Director Robert K. Nicholson III acquired 13,000 shares of Lakeland Bancorp stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, December 21st. The stock was acquired at an average price of $14.45 per share, for a total transaction of $187,850.00. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available through the SEC website. Also, Director James E. Hanson II acquired 1,585 shares of Lakeland Bancorp stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, February 1st. The shares were bought at an average price of $15.78 per share, with a total value of $25,011.30. The disclosure for this purchase can be found here. In the last quarter, insiders bought 15,585 shares of company stock valued at $227,511. Insiders own 6.07% of the company’s stock.

Large investors have recently added to or reduced their stakes in the stock. Acadian Asset Management LLC acquired a new position in Lakeland Bancorp during the 4th quarter valued at approximately $49,000. Legal & General Group Plc boosted its position in Lakeland Bancorp by 12.4% during the 4th quarter. Legal & General Group Plc now owns 8,146 shares of the financial services provider’s stock worth $120,000 after acquiring an additional 897 shares during the period. Panagora Asset Management Inc. acquired a new position in Lakeland Bancorp during the 3rd quarter worth $156,000. Algert Global LLC acquired a new position in Lakeland Bancorp during the 4th quarter worth $153,000. Finally, Hotaling Investment Management LLC acquired a new position in Lakeland Bancorp during the 4th quarter worth $156,000. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 55.58% of the company’s stock.

Lakeland Bancorp Company Profile

Lakeland Bancorp, Inc operates as the bank holding company for Lakeland Bank that provides financial products and services for individuals and small to medium sized businesses. It offers commercial banking services, including savings, money market, and time accounts, as well as demand deposits; lending solutions, such as short and medium term loans, lines of credit, letters of credit, inventory and accounts receivable financing, real estate construction loans, mortgage loans, small business administration loans, commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and equipment financing, as well as merchant credit card services; and Internet banking, mobile banking, wire transfer, night depository, and cash management services.

Read More: Net Margin

Thursday, February 21, 2019

Top Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now

tags:LUNA,SORL,XIN,SB,

There are numerous trading techniques to consider for each and every options trade, so Fred Oltarsh at Options Strategy Network details five of the ones he considers extremely vital for trying to put the percentages in the trader's favor.

The key to trading options contracts successfully (individual stocks and futures as well) is to put the percentages in your favor. This involves numerous trading techniques discussed in the Options Strategy Network options guide. Briefly, one should consider the following factors for each and every trade: 1) liquidity or the cost to initiate and liquidate the position, 2) implied volatility or the relative value of the particular option one is trading, 3) having a pre-designated point of liquidation, 4) risk/reward ratio after commissions and slippage and 5) diversification of strategies and trades.

Each analysis described above increases the likelihood of success of an individual trade. Examining the liquidity of the market that one is about to trade is the first step to increasing levels of productivity. If one is buying a stock for a long-term hold, the implications of liquidity are not as great for that trader as for the trader who intends to buy and sell stock frequently. If one is day trading, whether stocks or options, even a bid/ask spread of a penny on a low priced stock, has an impact on the bottom line. The best way to analyze it is to quickly determine the difference of the bid/ask spread as a percentage of the value of the instrument traded. Then determine what that value is per one thousand dollars invested. If the number sounds high, it's probably worth staying away from that trade.

Top Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now: Luna Innovations Incorporated(LUNA)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Luna Innovations (NASDAQ:LUNA) major shareholder Clinic Carilion sold 6,100 shares of Luna Innovations stock in a transaction on Friday, May 25th. The shares were sold at an average price of $3.41, for a total transaction of $20,801.00. Following the completion of the sale, the insider now owns 2,054,385 shares of the company’s stock, valued at approximately $7,005,452.85. The transaction was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through this link. Large shareholders that own at least 10% of a company’s shares are required to disclose their sales and purchases with the SEC.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Luna Coin (CURRENCY:LUNA) traded up 0.8% against the dollar during the one day period ending at 14:00 PM Eastern on September 18th. One Luna Coin coin can now be bought for about $0.0086 or 0.00000135 BTC on exchanges including CoinExchange and YoBit. Luna Coin has a market cap of $14,603.00 and approximately $2.00 worth of Luna Coin was traded on exchanges in the last day. In the last seven days, Luna Coin has traded down 6.7% against the dollar.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Luna Coin (CURRENCY:LUNA) traded 5.2% higher against the dollar during the 24 hour period ending at 16:00 PM Eastern on September 26th. Luna Coin has a total market capitalization of $11,480.00 and approximately $13.00 worth of Luna Coin was traded on exchanges in the last day. One Luna Coin coin can now be bought for $0.0067 or 0.00000104 BTC on major exchanges including CoinExchange and YoBit. Over the last seven days, Luna Coin has traded 20.8% lower against the dollar.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    PRA Health Sciences (NASDAQ: PRAH) and Luna Innovations (NASDAQ:LUNA) are both medical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and earnings.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Luna Innovations (LUNA)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Top Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now: SORL Auto Parts Inc.(SORL)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Lisa Levin] Gainers Euro Tech Holdings Company Limited (NASDAQ: CLWT) shares rose 14.1 percent to $3.65 in the pre-market trading session after reporting 2017 year-end results. LightPath Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: LPTH) rose 13.3 percent to $2.43 in pre-market trading after reporting a third-quarter earnings beat. MYnd Analytics, Inc. (NASDAQ: MYND) rose 10.5 percent to $3.49 in pre-market trading. MYnd Analytics reported a Q2 net loss of $2.7 million on revenue of $459,900. SORL Auto Parts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SORL) shares rose 8.4 percent to $5.68 in pre-market trading after reporting upbeat Q1 results. Famous Dave's of America, Inc. (NASDAQ: DAVE) shares rose 7.7 percent to $8.40 in pre-market trading after the company reported upbeat earnings for its first quarter on Monday. Xenon Pharmaceuticals Inc. (NASDAQ: XENE) rose 7.5 percent to $6.45 in pre-market trading after the company presented XEN901 Phase 1 clinical update and XEN1101 TMS pharmacodynamic Phase 1 data. Mimecast Ltd (NASDAQ: MIME) rose 6.5 percent to $43.50 in pre-market trading following a first-quarter sales beat. Boxlight Corporation (NASDAQ: BOXL) rose 6 percent to $12.50 in pre-market trading after surging 77.44 percent on Monday. Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTLA) shares rose 6 percent to $26.05 in pre-market trading after climbing 3.58 percent on Monday. PPDAI Group Inc. (NASDAQ: PPDF) rose 4.7 percent to $7.20 in pre-market trading following Q1 results. Xunlei Limited (NASDAQ: XNET) rose 4.1 percent to $13.88 in pre-market trading after gaining 2.54 percent on Monday. Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. (NYSE: VRX) shares rose 4.5 percent to $21.73 in pre-market trading. Mizuho upgraded Valeant from Neutral to Buy. Bovie Medical Corporation (NYSE: BVX) rose 4.1 percent to $3.80 in pre-market trading after reporting a first-quarter sales beat. Myomo, Inc. (NYSE: MYO) rose 3.4 percent to $4.00 in pre-market trading after jumping 23.25 percent o
  • [By Lisa Levin]

    Shares of SORL Auto Parts, Inc. (NASDAQ: SORL) got a boost, shooting up 13 percent to $5.90 after reporting upbeat Q1 results.

    Hollysys Automation Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: HOLI) shares were also up, gaining 24 percent to $27.3947 following Q3 results.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Sorl Auto Parts (NASDAQ:SORL) was upgraded by analysts at ValuEngine from a strong sell rating to a sell rating.

    Strattec Security (NASDAQ:STRT) was upgraded by analysts at ValuEngine from a sell rating to a hold rating.

Top Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now: Xinyuan Real Estate Co Ltd(XIN)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Mixin (XIN) is a proof-of-stake (PoS) token that uses the SHA256 hashing algorithm. It launched on October 2nd, 2017. Mixin’s total supply is 1,000,000 tokens and its circulating supply is 438,115 tokens. Mixin’s official message board is mixin.one/logs. Mixin’s official Twitter account is @XIN_Foundation and its Facebook page is accessible here. The official website for Mixin is mixin.one.

  • [By Motley Fool Transcribers]

    Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd.  (NYSE:XIN)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 15, 2019, 8:00 a.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Xinyuan Real Estate Co., Ltd. (NYSE:XIN) declared a quarterly dividend on Wednesday, May 30th, RTT News reports. Stockholders of record on Monday, June 11th will be given a dividend of 0.05 per share by the financial services provider on Friday, June 22nd. This represents a $0.20 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 3.74%.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Mixin (XIN) is a proof-of-stake (PoS) token that uses the SHA256 hashing algorithm. It launched on October 2nd, 2017. Mixin’s total supply is 1,000,000 tokens and its circulating supply is 442,200 tokens. Mixin’s official Twitter account is @XIN_Foundation and its Facebook page is accessible here. Mixin’s official message board is mixin.one/logs. The official website for Mixin is mixin.one.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Mixin (CURRENCY:XIN) traded up 6.2% against the U.S. dollar during the 1-day period ending at 20:00 PM E.T. on July 17th. One Mixin token can currently be purchased for approximately $550.98 or 0.07481400 BTC on popular cryptocurrency exchanges. Mixin has a total market cap of $241.93 million and approximately $90,201.00 worth of Mixin was traded on exchanges in the last day. Over the last week, Mixin has traded up 19.1% against the U.S. dollar.

Top Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now: Safe Bulkers Inc(SB)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Here are some of the news articles that may have impacted Accern’s rankings:

    Get Safe Bulkers alerts: Safe Bulkers (SB): Moving Average Crossover Alert (finance.yahoo.com) Should Investors Have Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE:SB) In Their Porfolio After Profit Growth of 0.63922? (zeelandpress.com) Detailed Research: Economic Perspectives on Safe Bulkers, SITO Mobile, Castle Brands, Motorcar Parts of America … (nasdaq.com) Simple Rule To have an eye on These Stocks:- BioTime, Inc. (NYSE:BTX), Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE:SB), Mettler-Toledo … (thestreetpoint.com) Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE:SB): How is this stock valued? (cantoncaller.com)

    Several research firms have commented on SB. Zacks Investment Research downgraded shares of Safe Bulkers from a “hold” rating to a “strong sell” rating in a research report on Wednesday, August 1st. ValuEngine downgraded shares of Safe Bulkers from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research report on Tuesday. TheStreet raised shares of Safe Bulkers from a “d+” rating to a “c-” rating in a research report on Wednesday, June 27th. Seaport Global Securities raised shares of Safe Bulkers from a “neutral” rating to a “buy” rating and increased their target price for the stock from $3.50 to $5.00 in a research report on Tuesday, July 31st. Finally, Maxim Group reissued a “buy” rating and set a $6.00 target price on shares of Safe Bulkers in a research report on Monday, July 23rd. Three analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, three have given a hold rating and two have issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. The company currently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $3.79.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Safe Bulkers (SB)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Lisa Levin]

    Check out these big penny stock gainers and losers

    Losers Big Lots, Inc. (NYSE: BIG) shares fell 9.6 percent to $37.01 in pre-market trading after the company reported weaker-than-expected results for its first quarter and issued downbeat earnings forecast. Tilly's, Inc. (NYSE: TLYS) fell 5.7 percent to $12.98 in pre-market trading after rising 12.69 percent on Thursday. Turkcell Iletisim Hizmetleri A.S. (NYSE: TKC) fell 4.2 percent to $6.39 in pre-market trading after dropping 4.71 percent on Thursday. Sunlands Online Education Group (NYSE: STG) fell 4.2 percent to $9.13 in pre-market trading. Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB) fell 4.2 percent to $3.42 in pre-market trading after climbing 12.62 percent on Thursday. Ulta Beauty, Inc. (NASDAQ: ULTA) fell 4.1 percent to $236.80 in pre-market trading. Ulta Beauty reported upbeat results for its first quarter, but issued weak second-quarter earnings and sales guidance. GameStop Corp. (NYSE: GME) shares fell 3.8 percent to $12.70 in pre-market trading. GameStop reported in-line earnings for its first quarter, while sales missed estimates. Workday, Inc. (NASDAQ: WDAY) fell 3.2 percent to $126.85 in the pre-market trading session after the company posted Q1 results. Lumentum Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: LITE) shares fell 3 percent to $57.15 in pre-market trading
  • [By Rich Smith]

    Ocean-going bulk shipper Safe Bulkers (NYSE:SB) reported its fiscal Q1 2018 earnings results on Tuesday -- an "earnings beat" that nudged the company's shares up 2%. But it took until Thursday for the real good news to arrive. Today, all of the sudden, the stock jumped out of its berth and closed 12.2% higher.

  • [By Lisa Levin]

     

    Companies Reporting After The Bell SpartanNash Company (NASDAQ: SPTN) is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.53 per share on revenue of $2.38 billion. HP Inc. (NYSE: HPQ) is expected to post quarterly earnings at $0.48 per share on revenue of $13.57 billion. salesforce.com, inc. (NYSE: CRM) is projected to post quarterly earnings at $0.47 per share on revenue of $2.94 billion. HEICO Corporation (NYSE: HEI) is estimated to post quarterly earnings at $0.53 per share on revenue of $424.96 million. Safe Bulkers, Inc. (NYSE: SB) is expected to post quarterly earnings at $0.02 per share on revenue of $41.10 million

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Mettler-toledo International Inc (MTD) President and CEO Oliver A Filliol Sold $22.7 million of Shar

President and CEO of Mettler-toledo International Inc (NYSE:MTD) Oliver A Filliol sold 34,100 shares of MTD on 02/15/2019 at an average price of $666.3 a share. The total sale was $22.7 million.

Mettler-Toledo International Inc supplies weighing and precision instruments to customers in the life sciences, industrial and food retail industries. Its products are laboratory scales, pipettes, pH meters, thermal analysis equipment and others. Mettler-Toledo International Inc has a market cap of $16.53 billion; its shares were traded at around $666.47 with a P/E ratio of 33.51 and P/S ratio of 5.85. Mettler-Toledo International Inc had annual average EBITDA growth of 13.00% over the past ten years. GuruFocus rated Mettler-Toledo International Inc the business predictability rank of 5-star.

CEO Recent Trades:

President and CEO Oliver A Filliol sold 34,100 shares of MTD stock on 02/15/2019 at the average price of $666.3. The price of the stock has increased by 0.03% since.President and CEO Oliver A Filliol sold 34,000 shares of MTD stock on 02/12/2019 at the average price of $664.37. The price of the stock has increased by 0.32% since.

CFO Recent Trades:

CFO Shawn Vadala sold 670 shares of MTD stock on 02/13/2019 at the average price of $670. The price of the stock has decreased by 0.53% since.

Directors and Officers Recent Trades:

Director Robert F Spoerry sold 16,713 shares of MTD stock on 02/14/2019 at the average price of $669.47. The price of the stock has decreased by 0.45% since.Head of Human Resources Christian Magloth sold 1,500 shares of MTD stock on 02/13/2019 at the average price of $666.91. The price of the stock has decreased by 0.07% since.Director Robert F Spoerry sold 23,175 shares of MTD stock on 02/12/2019 at the average price of $665.14. The price of the stock has increased by 0.2% since.Director Thomas P Salice sold 1,100 shares of MTD stock on 02/12/2019 at the average price of $669. The price of the stock has decreased by 0.38% since.Director Hans Ulrich Maerki sold 7,180 shares of MTD stock on 02/12/2019 at the average price of $665.57. The price of the stock has increased by 0.14% since.

For the complete insider trading history of MTD, click here

.

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

Is Buckeye Partners a Buy?

There are few things the stock market likes less than a dividend cut. Midstream energy company Kinder Morgan (NYSE:KMI) found this out back in 2015 when it slashed its payout by 75%; the share price still hasn't recovered.

Likewise, fellow midstream company Buckeye Partners (NYSE:BPL) was subjected to rough treatment by the market after it cut its payout by 40% in 2018. Shares of the master limited partnership (MLP) have tumbled more than 35% over the past year. But sometimes, big share price drops can create good buying opportunities for investors. Let's take a look at this beaten-down energy infrastructure company to see if it is in that position.

Pipelines in a trench

Oil and gas industry player Buckeye Partners has been punished by the stock market. Image source: Getty Images.

The do-over

One of the biggest attractions of MLP shares are their yields. In return for preferential tax treatment, MLPs pay out almost all of their cash flow as distributions to unitholders -- for all intents and purposes, equivalent to the dividends many companies pay to stockholders. And those MLP distributions can be high: Buckeye's was nearly 15% before it slashed its dividend and even today, now that the dust has settled -- and the share price has dropped -- it sits at about 9.7%.

Buckeye had a long history of quarterly distribution increases. But in 2017, the company went into debt to finance several projects including the $1.15 billion purchase of a 50% stake in overseas terminal operator VTTI. To help pay for the acquisition, Buckeye also issued new units, which diluted net income per unit. Unfortunately, the purchase didn't work out as planned: A weak storage environment left Buckeye struggling to fill its Caribbean terminals to capacity. It stopped its quarterly distribution increases, but suggested it would at least make annual increases instead.

But then, with distribution coverage dropping below 1.0 -- meaning the partnership wasn't able to fully fund its distribution with cash from operations -- all that debt the company had taken on came back to bite it, because management was concerned about maintaining its investment-grade credit rating. On the Q3 earnings call, they bit the bullet, and announced they were cutting the dividend and selling the stake in VTTI. The share price dropped, but the company ended up in almost the same spot it had been in prior to the acquisition -- with no VTTI, lower debt, and solid distribution coverage.

Growing pains

Of course, this is a management team that has made some serious missteps, from the ill-fated VTTI purchase to its assurances to investors in Q2 2018 that it had no plans to cut the distribution. It's no surprise that Buckeye's return on capital employed -- a measure of management's effectiveness -- is about 1.5%, one of the lowest I could find among MLPs.

However, Kinder Morgan has begun to get back into investors' good graces by executing well in the wake of its own payout cut. If Buckeye's management can use its "hard reset" to do the same, perhaps its units could be worth considering.

On the company's most recent earnings call, CEO Clark Smith identified a handful of "higher-return growth opportunities," including a bidirectional pipeline in Ohio and Michigan that's still waiting on regulatory approval, expansions to the company's big Chicago Complex, and the South Texas Gateway marine terminal project for crude oil exports. 

While some of these projects seem promising, others may run into trouble. For example, the company can't provide a timeline for when the Ohio-Michigan pipeline might come online, and the South Texas Gateway project has numerous competitors vying to store and export Permian crude via the Gulf Coast. 

Show me the money

Even if everything goes Buckeye's way with these projects, the company is only planning to spend between $250 million and $300 million on growth capital expenditures in all of 2019. That's a pittance compared to many of its MLP peers:

Company Market Cap Revenue (TTM) EBITDA (TTM) 2019 Projected Growth CAPEX
Magellan Midstream Partners $13.4 billion $2.8 billion $1.8 billion $1.3 billion
NuStar LP $2.7 billion $2.0 billion $627.0 million $425 million
Buckeye Partners $5.0 billion $4.1 billion $341.2 million

$250 million to $300 million

Data source: Company earnings calls and reports. TTM = Trailing Twelve Months. CAPEX = capital expenditures. Chart by author.

Magellan Midstream Partners, for example, is planning to spend about 45.9% of its annual revenue and roughly 10% of its market cap on growth capex in 2019. The smaller NuStar is set to spend about 21.7% of its revenue and about 15.5% of its market cap. By contrast, even if Buckeye spends $300 million in 2019, that amounts to just 7.3% of its annual revenue and only around 6% of its market cap. That may not move the needle much.

Of course, as you can see in the chart above, all three MLPs are spending amounts a bit lower than their annual EBITDA. But on a percentage basis, Buckeye's $341 million trailing EBITDA is much worse than its peers', despite its higher revenue. 

Investor takeaway

Buckeye Partners has not been a good investment in recent years, due to management missteps and the slashing of its payouts. Since management remains the same, Buckeye would have to be a compelling investment indeed to be considered a solid "buy."

Unfortunately, despite its high yield, it doesn't look as though Buckeye has a particularly strong plan to break out of the doldrums and get its business growing again. While the company's balance sheet is now in much better shape, there are other MLPs with similarly decent balance sheets -- and better managerial track records. 

Monday, February 18, 2019

Why Newell Brands, TrueCar, and XPO Logistics Slumped Today

Friday was a good day on Wall Street, as positive news on the domestic political front spurred market participants to send stock benchmarks to substantial gains. Earnings season has reached its peak, but overall, investors have been a lot more comfortable with the idea that sustained economic growth could last further into 2019 than they were during the stock market's swoon in December. Nevertheless, not every company was able to find success during a tough period. Newell Brands (NYSE:NWL), TrueCar (NASDAQ:TRUE), and XPO Logistics (NYSE:XPO) were among the worst performers. Here's why they did so poorly.

Newell's results leave shareholders throwing a tantrum

Shares of Newell Brands dropped 21% after the company reported its fourth-quarter financial results. The maker of products including Graco baby strollers, Rubbermaid kitchenware, and Sharpie pens said that revenue fell 6% in the fourth quarter compared to the year-earlier period, and modest gains in earnings didn't match up to what investors had hoped to see. Poor results were found throughout the business, with the learning and development, food and appliances, and home and outdoor living segments all seeing top-line declines. Moreover, Newell warned that sales challenges would likely persist throughout 2019. CEO Michael Polk is optimistic that the company can complete its transformation plan this year, but that forces shareholders to continue being patient for another year.

Smiling person in front of a car, with TrueCar promotional text superimposed.

Image source: TrueCar.

TrueCar runs off the road

TrueCar saw its stock plunge 25% following the release of its fourth-quarter financial report. The online car-shopping service saw sales climb 10% from year-ago levels, but TrueCar still posted a modest loss for the period, and adjusted earnings weren't as strong as those following the stock had expected. Unique visitor counts to its website were down from year-earlier marks, and CEO Chip Perry pointed to troubles with TrueCar's operations in explaining both the downbeat results and the restrained projections the company made for 2019. Until it can demonstrate its ability to get back in gear, TrueCar might have trouble regaining investor confidence.

XPO can't go the extra mile

Finally, shares of XPO Logistics fell nearly 13%. The transportation and logistics company said that sales growth slowed to just 5% during the fourth quarter of 2018, falling from double-digit percentage levels in the previous quarter. XPO noted that challenges in key parts of Europe weighed on its results, but the logistics company also suffered from weaker profitability due to strategic decisions from its largest customer, which is widely believed to be highly dependent on e-commerce-related deliveries. CEO Brad Jacobs warned that those obstacles could remain in place well into 2019, and that has some shareholders looking at whether it makes sense to bank on a near-term recovery for XPO.

Sunday, February 17, 2019

United States Steel Corp (X) Files 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended on December 31, 2018

United States Steel Corp (NYSE:X) files its latest 10-K with SEC for the fiscal year ended on December 31, 2018. United States Steel Corp is an integrated steel producer. Its products include flat-rolled and tubular products with production operations in North America and Europe. Its products cater to automotive, construction and energy companies. United States Steel Corp has a market cap of $3.99 billion; its shares were traded at around $23.03 with a P/E ratio of 3.72 and P/S ratio of 0.28. The dividend yield of United States Steel Corp stocks is 0.86%.

For the last quarter United States Steel Corp reported a revenue of $3.7 billion, compared with the revenue of $3.1 billion during the same period a year ago. For the latest fiscal year the company reported a revenue of $14.2 billion, an increase of 15.7% from last year. For the last five years United States Steel Corp had an average revenue decline of 6.2% a year.

The reported diluted earnings per share was $6.25 for the year, compared with the loss per share of $0.69 in the previous year. The United States Steel Corp had an operating margin of 7.19%, compared with the operating margin of 4.23% a year before. The 10-year historical median operating margin of United States Steel Corp is 0.69%. The profitability rank of the company is 4 (out of 10).

At the end of the fiscal year, United States Steel Corp has the cash and cash equivalents of $1,000.0 million, compared with $1.6 billion in the previous year. The long term debt was $2.3 billion, compared with $2.7 billion in the previous year. The interest coverage to the debt is 8.7. United States Steel Corp has a financial strength rank of 6 (out of 10).

At the current stock price of $23.03, United States Steel Corp is traded at close to its historical median P/S valuation band of $21.45. The P/S ratio of the stock is 0.28, while the historical median P/S ratio is 0.27. The stock lost 40.94% during the past 12 months.

For the complete 20-year historical financial data of X, click here.

Friday, February 15, 2019

Wealthfront joins the battle for deposits with a high-yield cash account

Wealthfront is going after a key banking function: Storing people's cash.

The decade-old fintech company, which began as an automated financial advisor start-up, announced the launch of a cash account Thursday. The move allows Wealthfront to hold customers' money and return a 2.24 percent yield.

"We view the banking industry is the next piece in financial services for targeting innovation," Wealthfront founder Dan Carroll told CNBC in a phone interview. "The best financial decisions can ultimately be on autopilot, and this will be an enormous competitive advantage of us going forward."

The company is betting that its customers, 90 percent of whom are younger than 45, don't want human interaction in their banking experience. Carroll highlighted overdraft fees, "confusing services," or banks that "force you to go to a branch, or even worse, dial a call center."

Wealthfront, which manages $11.5 billion in customer assets, started out with free financial planning, investment management and lending through its portfolio line of credit. The cash account is meant to complement those planning and investing programs.

"It's the ideal way to address your short term goals like creating an emergency fund, saving for a car or even a home," Carroll said in a blog post Thursday.

The assets aren't actually held with Wealthfront. Instead, the company is partnering with FDIC-insured banks including East West Bank and New York Community Bank.

The company said it cleared the cash account idea with regulators ahead of the launch. The announcement comes two months after Robinhood's botched attempt to launch its own cash account, which it had marketed as a checking and savings account. The president of SIPC, which in charge of overseeing Robinhood as a brokerage, told CNBC at the time that the start-up's announcement caught him completely off guard.

Within a day, Robinhood's founders said they would re-launch and re-brand the no-fee accounts with no minimums, which "may have caused some confusion."

Fintechs are reaching further into Wall Street's territory, often at lower costs with a sleeker interface. As they age, start-ups are expanding the capabilities either through new product launches or acquisitions.

"Fintech firms are becoming more aggressive in expanding their lines of business beyond their initial use case," CB insights senior tech analyst Lindsay Bell said in the firm's outlook report. "In 2019, the battle for millennial deposits will become more aggressive as fintech account products hit the market."

Carroll said the firm will continue to take on the "old guard" of Wall Street and that banking is a "key initiative" for Wealthfront in 2019.

"Young people don't like what the banks are selling," Carroll said. "That leaves a future in financial services to be enacted through clicks, not conversations."

Thursday, February 14, 2019

Walt Disney Management Talks Fox, ESPN+, and Disney+

Walt Disney's (NYSE:DIS) fiscal first-quarter results highlighted strong performance from the media giant. The period featured better-than-expected revenue and earnings per share, coming in at $15.3 billion and $1.84, respectively -- ahead of consensus analyst estimates of $5.1 billion and $1.55.

But given Disney's big plans for 2019, there's a lot more on investors' minds than the company's fiscal first-quarter financial performance. The company's recently launched ESPN+ streaming service, its pending acquisition of Twenty-First Century Fox (NASDAQ:FOX) (NASDAQ:FOXA), and the upcoming launch of its Disney-branded streaming service remain the most critical narratives for investors to watch. This is why investors may want to look beyond Disney's fiscal first-quarter earnings release to management's quarterly earnings call, where key topics like these were discussed.

Here are three key quotes from the call.

A man using the ESPN+ app on his smartphone.

ESPN+. Image source: Walt Disney.

ESPN+ is growing rapidly

Walt Disney launched its first direct-to-consumer (DTC) streaming service last April. Based on its popular ESPN live sports brand, the subscription service gave subscribers access to content incremental to its existing network content for $4.99 a month, or $49.99 per year.

The service saw rapid growth right out of the gate, hitting 1 million subscribers in September -- about five months after its launch. Fortunately, this rapid growth has continued. Less than five months later, the service has surpassed another important milestone.

"ESPN+ now has 2 million paid subscriptions," said Disney CEO Robert Iger in the company's fiscal first-quarter earnings call, "double the number from just five months ago."

Fox will "provide opportunities for growth"

Last July, Disney announced that its shareholders and Twenty-First Century Fox shareholders had both officially approved Disney's acquisition of a significant portion of Fox's assets. The assets to be acquired by Disney include Fox's film production business, National Geographic Partners, Fox's interests in Hulu (upping Disney's stake in the streaming service from 30% to 60%), and more. 

While the acquisition hasn't closed yet, this doesn't mean management isn't already thinking through how these new assets will benefit Disney.

"The addition of content and management talent from Twenty-First Century Fox will further enhance our DTC efforts and provide opportunities for growth across the company," said Iger. "Having already designed much of the integration process, we're prepared to start effectively combining our businesses as soon as we obtain regulatory approval from the last few remaining markets."

Disney+ is a major initiative

The company's Disney+ streaming service, slated to launch in the second half of 2019, isn't a half-hearted effort, but a key part of the company's top priority: to build a robust DTC business.

Iger explained the company's commitment to launching quality content for its Disney+ service in Disney's earnings call:

We have a number of great creative engines across our company, all of which are dedicating their talent, focus, and resources to develop and produce strong content for the Disney+ platform. Most of the teams creating shows and movies for this service are the same innovators and storytellers driving the prolific success of Disney, Pixar, Marvel, and Lucasfilm, operating under the same expectations of excellence.

Investors will get to see a preview of the Disney+ platform at the company's investor day on April 11, Iger said. "We'll also take that opportunity to provide detailed insight into our overall DTC business," the CEO added.

Wednesday, February 13, 2019

Tech Stocks Last Week: Zendesk Rises and Twitter Falls

As earnings season continues, a number of stocks in tech managed to surprise last week. Two companies that saw their stocks make particularly big moves are Zendesk (NYSE:ZEN) and Twitter (NYSE:TWTR).

While both of these stocks saw double-digit percentage changes in their stock prices following their earnings releases last week, they moved in opposite directions. Twitter stock fell about 10% during the week, while Zendesk rose about 11%.

Here's a look at some of the key figures from each company's results.

The word, technology, over computer codes

Image source: Getty Images.

Zendesk

Customer-service platform Zendesk (NYSE:ZEN) impressed investors with better-than-expected top- and bottom-line results and strong guidance for 2019.

The company's revenue rose 41% year over year to $172 million. Zendesk's fourth-quarter non-GAAP earnings per share was $0.10, easily beating a consensus analyst estimate for $0.03.

Highlighting one factor that was key to the company's momentum during the quarter, the number of contracts Zendesk signed with an annual value of $50,000 or more was up 6% compared with the same quarter in 2017. Furthermore, the average value of these contracts was 60% higher.

The company also said the percentage of its monthly recurring revenue coming from customers with 100 or more support agents was 40%, up from 38% in the year-ago quarter.

For the full year of 2019, management guided for revenue to rise about 34% year over year. While this would mark a deceleration compared with the company's 39% year-over-year revenue growth in 2018, it still represents a strong growth rate.

Twitter

Social network Twitter also reported better-than-expected revenue and earnings per share. But shares fell despite this upside surprise. Investors were probably concerned with the company's weaker-than-expected revenue guidance for its first quarter.

Twitter's fourth-quarter revenue jumped 26% year over year in constant currency to $909 million. This helped non-GAAP earnings per share rise to $0.31, up from $0.19 in the year-ago quarter.

Importantly, Twitter's monetizable daily active users (mDAU) increased 9% year over year during the quarter. That was in line with growth in the key metric in Twitter's third quarter, despite the company's efforts to remove millions of spammy and suspicious accounts during the quarter as management prioritizes the health of its platform. In the U.S., mDAU increased 5% year over year to 27 million. Internationally, mDAU rose 11% year over year to 99 million.

Highlighting how well the company's ad products are performing, total ad engagements during the quarter were up 33% year over year. This increase, management explained in Twitter's fourth-quarter shareholder letter, was driven by higher demand and improved click-through rates.

The midpoint of Twitter's first-quarter revenue guidance for $715 million to $775 million was notably below analysts' consensus forecast for first-quarter revenue of $763 million.

Monday, February 11, 2019

Credicorp Ltd (BAP) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Credicorp Ltd  (NYSE:BAP)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 07, 2019, 9:30 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good morning, everyone. I would like to welcome all of you to Credicorp Ltd Fourth Quarter 2018 Conference Call. We now have our speakers in conference. Please be aware each of your lines is in a listen-only mode. At the conclusion of today's presentation, we will open the floor for questions. At that time. Instructions will be given to the procedure to follow, if you'd like to ask a question.

With us today is Mr. Walter Bayly, Chief Executive Officer; Mr. Alvaro Correa, Deputy Chief Executive Officer; Mr. Gianfranco Ferrari, Deputy Chief Executive Officer; Mr. Cesar Rios, Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Reynaldo Llosa, Chief Risk Officer; Ms. Francesca Raffo, Head of Transformation at BCP.

Now it is my pleasure to turn the conference over to Credicorps' Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Cesar Rios. Mr. Rios, you may begin.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Thank you. Good morning and welcome to Credicorp's Conference Call on our earning results for the fourth quarter of 2018. Before we review Credicorp's performance in the fourth quarter of 2018, I would like to highlight some important matters that characterize this scenario in which we have operated in the last few months. Tailwinds for our businesses, first, we expected real GDP growth in the last quarter of 2018 to stand close to 5% year-over-year.

With this result, the economy will have grown around 4% in 2018, one of the best results in the region, an efficient sector, public investment and private mining investment were the main drivers of growth in 2018.

Second, there were important investment announcements in 2018. One of the most notable was the Qullaveco mining project in Moquegua for $5 billion.

Third, the average price of copper is up $2.96 per pound in 2018, which represented a four-year peak. The price ended at $2.7 per pound.

Headwind for our businesses. First, global economic activity decelerated in the last quarter of 2018. Second, through 2018, we observed an escalation of trade tensions between the US and China. This has implied risk for global economic growth. Third, in 2018 we observed several episodes of financial volatility that impacted our trading-related activities. On the local front, Peru registered a slight decrease in corporate output during the second half of 2018.

Lastly, the Lava Jato scandal has had negative effect on economic activity through a paralysis of certain investment projects and political uncertainty. With regard to the political environment, the referendum held on December 9th had no material impact on the business environment. Finally, the most important political event in 2018 was in March 2018 when President Vizcarra took office.

Please let's move to the next page, here I would like to discuss the evolution of the local economy in the fourth quarter.

In chart number one, you can see that GDP growth peaked in the last quarter in the year as mentioned in the previous slide.

In chart number two, you can see that domestic demand is estimated to have recovered in 2018 and reached a five year peak. In chart number three, you can see that local and international interest rates, which affect our funding cost and businesses decreased in the last quarter of the year, in parallel the Peruvian Central Bank reference rate has remained stable at 2.75% since March 2018.

Finally in chart number four, the orange line shows that total loans in the Peruvian banking sector expanded 10.2% in 2018, which represents the highest growth rate in three years.

Consumer loans expanded 12.6% in 2018, which represent a three year peak. It is important to highlight that quarter-end loan balances at Credicorp grew 10.3% in 2018.

Please, next page. Regarding the full year performance. There are important aspects of our lines of businesses I would like to mention. In the case of universal banking. BCP improved its pace of loan growth in all segments after low loan expansion in 2017.

The loan mix in the first half of the year put downward pressure on NIM but toward the end of the year retail banking accelerated its pace of loan growth, leading to a swift recovery in net interest margins.

Moreover, for the fiscal second year, the cost of risk dropped, leading to a subsequent increase in Credicorp's risk-adjusted net interest margin.

However, although income generation improved, the cost to income ratio deteriorated due to acceleration in the pace of growth of operating expenses, which was in turn registered particularly in the last quarter of the year and changed the decreasing trend of the efficiency ratio observed in previous quarters. We will explain this topic in detail later on.

BCP Bolivia reported a good level of loan growth and a reduction in provisions, however the funding costs and operating expenses increased and accordingly profitability for us.

With regard to microfinance. Mibanco posted a good level of loan growth although loan origination slowed down in the third quarter. The cost of risk was relatively stable in comparison to 2017 level even though it deteriorated in the second and third quarter. Mibanco improved its cost of risk during the last quarter. Moreover, Mibanco has improved its funding structure by increasing retail deposit share of total funding.

After significantly improving its operational efficiency in 2017 and 2018, Mibanco has started building capabilities to sustain business growth, which translated in an acceleration of the pace of growth of its operating expense.

Mibanco has started increasing its number of loan officers and building new channels leveraging Its digital capabilities. Regarding the challenges this subsidiary has faced, it is important to mention that the downward pressure in margin is due to competition.

With regard to the insurance and pension funds. The insurance business posted an increase in its contribution to Credicorp due to an improvement in the underwriting results posted by the life insurance business and to the good results of health business from the association with Banmedica, all the aforementioned offset the deterioration in the underwriting results of the P&C business as increasing net claims and acquisition costs were higher than the increase in net earned premiums. The pension fund business also improved its performance after recovering the profitability of its funds under management on those results. However, the tender for new affiliates that was held on December 2018 was not awarded to Prima.

In Investment Banking and Wealth Management, in 2018, wealth management income grew in Peru and Chile offsetting a decrease in income in Colombia. Additionally, total expenses remained stable although the cost to income ratio deteriorated due to a decrease in total income.

In the last quarter of 2018, Credicorp's Capital Chile posted an impairment in goodwill for PEN 38 million, which was mainly due to the adjustment of the discount rate.

Finally, the mark-to-market of proprietary investments deteriorated mainly due to the increase in interest rates.

Next slide, please. In this chart, you can see the most important figures of Credicorp's performance in the fourth quarter. Credicorp reported net income of PEN 957 million solids, which was 5.4% below the third quarter results of the previous year of the previous quarter and 10% below those registered in the fourth quarter of 2017.

The results represent a return on average equity and average assets of 16.3% and 2.2% respectively. The quarter-over-quarter evolution reflects the effect of the significant increase in operating expenses, which offset the favorable evolution posted by the net income, coincident with non-financial income and provision for loan losses.

The year-over-year drop in net income is attributable to three factors, an acceleration in the pace of growth of operating expenses and an impairment of PEN 38 million of Credicorp's Capital Chile, both reported in 2017. And the sale of ENEL shares in the fourth quarter of 2017, we generated income of PEN 163.7 million.

Finally, it is noteworthy, first the acceleration in the pace of loan growth and its positive impact in net interest income, which posted the highest quarterly growth rate in 2018 and second the improvement in cost of risk.

Next page, please. In this chart, you can see the full-year results. Net income reached a level of PEN 3.9 billion solids, which represented a return on to average equity and average assets of 17.5% and 2.3% respectively.

These results were 2.6% below those obtained in 2017 due to, first, the gain of PEN 444.7 million from the sale of two loans and equity investments, BCI and ENEL registered in 2017. And second but to a lesser extent, decreasing operating expenses and impairment at Credicorp Capital Chile.

However, it is important to highlight the significant improvements in core items such as the acceleration in the pace of loan growth, the significant reduction in cost of risk and the recovery of risk-adjusted net interest margins and expansion of fee income and gains on FX transactions.

Finally, in terms of capital ratio with BCP Standalone, the BIS Tier 1 and core equity Tier 1 ratios decreased due to a strong growth in risk-weighted assets in line with loan expansions.

It is important to remember that we keep Credicorp's level a reserve fund of approximately PEN 1.5 billion facilities, which is invested in liquid low-risk assets. This fund has the effect of reducing Credicorp's return on average equity by around 100 basis points.

Let's review the main figures and indicators in more detail. As you can see in chart number one, first, interest-earning assets measured in quarter-end balances remained relatively stable quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year. Second, there was a change in the composition of interest-earning assets in favor of the most profitable asset loans, which increased their share in total interest-earning assets. This trend was observed throughout 2018. Third, as shown in chart number two, average daily loan balances expanded 9.2% in 2018. Furthermore, in terms of loan needs by business segment, loan expansion was mainly driving by wholesale banking followed by retail banking, and Mibanco. It is important to note the loan expansion in retail banking was led by the mortgage loan book. Fourth, in chart number three you can see the loan growth was posted in both local and foreign currency, however, the expansion in local currency loans outpace that of the foreign currency loans.

Next page, please. In terms of funding, first, as you can see in chart number one, Credicorp's funding structure shows an increase in deposit shares of total funding, which is more evident in the year-over-year analysis. This was the trend we observed throughout 2018. Second, in chart two for deposits by type, you can see that the mix in deposits has also favored funding given the low-cost deposits such as savings and demand deposits increased their share. The 13.8% year-over-year increase in saving deposits is noteworthy, and was driven mainly by the initial results posted by saving accounts opened at kiosks, which was the first program launch by BCP's strategic initiative transformation.

Third, as shown in chart number three, Credicorp's funding cost has remained relatively stable despite the upward trend in international rates, mainly due to a more favorable funding mix both by currency and by funding source.

Next page, net interest income grew 4.9% quarter-over-quarter, 8.6% year-over-year, and 5.2% in 2018, which represents an improvement compared to the results posted in the previous quarter, and in 2017. Performance shows, first, the positive effect of loan growth from interest income, where all segments of BCP and Mibanco expanded their portfolios. Second, the moderate increase in interest expenses, which was attributable to a more favorable funding structure than in previous years as we explained clearly.

Next page, please. With regard to risk quality in chart number one, you can see the quarter-over-quarter evolution of the total cost of risk, which decreased 20 basis points due to, first, the decrease in the provisions required for BCP due to the improvement of the risk quality of the portfolio and the provision due to reduction in the exposure to clients related to the Lava Jato Case.

Second, the decrease in the provision required at Mibanco after the adjustments made at the end of the second quarter of 2018 to recover risk quality. The analysis of full-year results are shown in chart number two. The contraction of 40 basis points in the total cost of risk is noteworthy and due mainly to, first, the reduction of BCP's provisions requirement due to the improvement in the risk quality of the portfolio in particular in the consumer and credit card segments and to the reversal of provisions from Lava Jato Case clients and second, the effect of 2017 of the provisional requirements for the El Nino Phenomenon and the Lava Jato Case. It is important to remember that on January 1st, 2018, Credicorp adopted the requirements of IFRS9 for loan provisions, who's first effect was a one-off increase of PEN 320 million loans, and off balance sheet exposures, due to methodology changes.

Next page please. As we discussed in previous slides, Credicorp's net interest margin was relatively stable in 2018, reaching a level of 5.26%. Furthermore, for the fourth consecutive year, the cost of risk improved and reach a level of 1.38%, 44 points below the level posted in 2012. As a result, Credicorp's risk-adjusted net interest margin increased 20 basis points and reached a level of 4.31%, the highest in six years. These results represent clear evidence of the (inaudible) challenging year in terms of risk quality and loan growth, risk-adjusted NIM has reached a healthy level.

Next page, please. From this page, we will discuss evolution of non-financial income. As you can see in chart number one, non-financial income expanded 6% quarter-over-quarter due to good performance for core items, fee income, net gains in foreign exchange transactions, and the net gain from associates, which refer to the health business from association with Banmedica. On a full year basis, as you can see in chart number two, the core items of non-financial income that we mentioned before also posted good performance. However, total non-financial income contracted 5.9% compared to the level in 2017. This was mainly attributable to, first, the income of PEN 444.7 million generated in 2017 from the sale of equity investments in BCI and ENEL and second, to a lesser extent the effect of market volatility throughout the year, that resulted in a decrease in the net gain in sales of securities and net gain in derivatives.

Next page, please. In the year-over-year analysis of operating efficiency, which eliminates seasonality, and in the full year analysis, you can see that the cost to income ratio deteriorated due to an acceleration in the pace of growth of operating expenses. This was mainly due to an increase in salary and employee benefits, administrative and general expenses, and acquisition costs of the insurance business. In 2018, approximately 50% of the increase in operating expenses was registered in BCP stand-alone, 30% in Pacifico and 10% in Mibanco. If we start with Mibanco, the expansion in operating expenses was mainly due to the developing of new capabilities to support the growth of our traditional businesses, international expansion, and the creation of digital products.

In the case of Pacifico, approximately 60% of this increase was mainly related to the expansion of sales in life insurance businesses, and the remaining 40% was mainly due to a change in the accounting of property and casualty of underwriting fees that previously were booked upfront, and from 2018 and on are accrued over the life on insurance policy. In the case of BCP as stand-alone, a third of the increase is due to the strategic initiative transformation, who's budget execution was accelerated at the end of the year. The remaining two-thirds were mainly due to three different drivers. First, expansion of transactional activity. Second, the increase in incentive for productivity on variable compensation, which were mainly explained due to sales volume above target and the outperformance in unaudited KPIs such as customer satisfaction. And third, at BCP stand-alone, net income surpassed budget, so we provisioned an additional profit sharing for employees.

Now, I would like to hand over this call to Francesca Raffo, Head of Transformation at BCP, who will talk about the strategic initiative transformation that we are executing at BCP.

Francesca Raffo -- BCP

Thank you. I'd like to show a couple slides today, the slide with the purpose and BCP's north star. We have established two north star goals for 2021. One of them being number one in customer experience in Peru and the next one having the best efficiency ratio in the region. To describe how those look like in more concrete terms, we have set six key results for 2021 and we have really challenged ourselves significantly to define them and we know we might not achieve all of them, but the purpose is to inspire and give sight to our ambition and to move the organization toward key results. The key results are a cost to income ratio around mid-30s, to duplicate the cross-sell ratio for our customers, to be able to pre-approve 50% of the economically active population, to be number one in employee experience, to serve 70% of our sales digitally and also a non-disclosed net income growth.

The next slide shows the way we approach the transformation. We started some years ago and we described it as we are on-board of a small -- of a large space ship on our way to planet XF(ph), the planet of experience and efficiency. Our program is currently organized in (inaudible), these we refer to as engines of the transformation and I will briefly comment on some of them. The first one, for digital journeys, this is focused in improving our customer experience through digital (Technical Difficulty) in our digital strategy as we are focused on increasing its use(ph). It helps us to (Technical Difficulty). 33% were served via digital and self-service channels. If we look at December (Technical Difficulty) and 34.6 respectively. (Technical Difficulty)

Operator

Excuse me, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your patience. We are reconnecting, please remain (Technical Difficulty), we are connecting the presenter line, please remain on the line.

Francesca Raffo -- BCP

Okay, perfect. So we're going to start again, looking at the key results. Slide number 16, so our main achievement for 2018 is as follows. Looking at our digital results by the end of 2018, 31% of our customers are digital customers growing from 21 two years ago. Considering our customer base has grown 30% in the same period, it means that the number of digital customers has grown more than 90% in the last two years. In terms of transactions, the transactions performed as a percentage of digital channels continues to grow and the percentage of total(ph) branches decreases. In December, 2018. 48 of our transactions were done via digital channels, that number turns into 59 when we include POS transactions and only 4% of the transactions are executed through branches.

Next slide, digital sales, regarding digital sales, in 2018 (Technical Difficulty) were served digitally. and 33% were served via digital and self-service channels. If you look at December alone, those numbers are 8.3% and 54.6%(ph) respectively. (Technical Difficulty) via digital channels. (Technical Difficulty) continues to grow. (Technical Difficulty) digital channel in December 2018 and in the first month of operation (Technical Difficulty), all the accounts openings were done via this channel. An additional 39% accounts with opened via our self-service kiosks. Regarding time deposits, 21% of them are now sold digitally. Finally regarding the loan portfolio, we launched credit card applications via web(ph) in December of 2018 and in the first month also it has contributed 2% of the total credit cards sold. Regarding our payroll advances product, one-third of them are served digitally. We continue to work on delivering new products via digital as we are convinced this brings both, better experience for our customers and more efficiency. The cost of opening a savings account is nine times lower than compared to that of digital channels. The next slide we look at satisfaction. Finally in terms of customer satisfaction, we remain as the market leader in our private banking, Enalta, affluent, small and mid-sized business and middle market corporate banking and institutional segment and we have achieved to grow from fourth to third place in our Consumer segment market, which is the biggest market in terms of number of customers. Thank you.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Francesca. Finally, in slide 19, we present our guidance, 2019 for reference for what we expect in terms of results. We perceive that the macro-economic context will be very similar to that same in 2017, and we estimate that first, loan growth will be in the range of 8% and 10%. Second, the cost of risk should remain within the range between 1.3% and 1.5%. Third, net interest margin should post at levels between 5.4% and 5.7%, which represent a slight increase. Fourth, risk-adjusted net interest margin should recover slightly. Fifth, the efficiency ratio should remain stable in comparison to the level posted in 2018; Six, the return on average equity should be between 17.5% and 18.5%.

Finally, it's important to mention that we are in the process in which we significantly build digital and self-service capabilities and at the same time, we are very prudent for serving the traditional distribution capabilities while we transition from one predominantly(ph).

Thank you. With these comments, I would like to open the Q&A, please.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you, sir. (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Gabriel Nobrega with Citi.

Gabriel Nobrega -- Citi -- Analyst

Hi, everyone. Thank you for the opportunity to ask questions. I actually have a question on your loan growth guidance -- hello? Are you listening? Okay. So I'll just go on. Just very quickly. I just want to understand here, why you are expecting a loan growth of around 8% to 10%, which is what you already delivered in 2018, given that the Peruvian economy could improve further during the year? And also here, if I you can may be give us some more color on what segments you are expecting to grow more? That would be very helpful? Thank you.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, please hold on the line while we reconnect the speakers again. Please hold on the line. Questioner, we will allow you to reask your question when the presenters have rejoined. Please remain on the line. Again, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your patience. We are reconnecting the speakers now, it would be just a moment. Please remain on the line.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Please continue with the Q&A recording(ph) here previously due to the communication issue.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our first question is on the line. Gabriel Nobrega with Citi. Please repeat your question.

Gabriel Nobrega -- Citi -- Analyst

Thank you for the opportunity to ask questions. I actually have a question regarding your loan growth guidance. I've been just (inaudible) on what you're expecting and what are you seeing in terms of loan demand and why do you expect maybe loan growth to remain in the same levels given that the Peruvian economy could improve further in 2018? And also here if I could ask may be, some more color on what segments you expect to grow the most? Thank you.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. First, we expect that the economy grow at a similar pace in 2019 and in 2018. We expect that in 2018, the growth is going to be around 4% and in 2019, we expect 3.7%, that is very similar. In terms of growth, our guidance is in sync with the level at the previous year between 8% and 10%, but probably with a different composition. During 2018, we have had significant growth in Wholesale Banking and we expect a slight difference in 2019, probably with higher levels of growth in consumer, credit cards, mid(ph) market and probably (inaudible) in Wholesale Banking.

Operator

Thank you. Again as a quick reminder, we ask that you please ask one question at a time. Our next question comes from Philip Finch with UBS.

Philip Finch -- UBS -- Analyst

Thank you for the presentation. I've got two questions, and I'll ask one question at a time. The first question is regarding your costs, your operating expenses. We saw this grow by around 11% year-on-year, which is significantly above inflation. Now you've given us efficiency guidelines for 2019. So really what I'd like to ask is, what sort of cost growth should we assume for 2019? At the same level that we saw in 2018? And what are the drivers for that? And I'll come back to my second question later. Thank you.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Okay. Probably, it will be more wise to review the drivers of the cost increase during 2018. As we mentioned previously, around 50% of the increase was produced in BCP Standalone. In case of BCP Standalone, we have probably have one-third of the cost increase due to the transformation efforts. The transformation is investing heavily in people, advisory, IT product, but is registered as new assets, and are experiments that we charge in the P&L. Two-thirds of the increase in BCP Standalone were in the traditional business and in this, we have two many drivers; one driver is due to the increased volumes and transactional levels, that drive IT expenses, marketing, loyalty programs and so on. And another important charge is due to the variable compensation, that was linked to commissions and incentives to pay to the sales forces.

Through the year, the productivity of the sale forces increased and especially in the last quarter, we fell well above targets and this caused two different things. One is, you have actually more volume than U.S. bank, so the level of payments goes above the target level. And additionally, we include in some key aspects, for example, customer satisfaction, the three-year additional bonuses. Down the road, we expect to have a increasing in sales efficiency, but probably we're doing to recalibrate the payment in a shorter period of time from quarterly to monthly.

(inaudible). We see that as a positive result. As a whole, at BCP Standalone, we excelled our budget, so we set aside more funds for profit sharing. Another important driver in the cost was in Pacifico. In Pacifico, we grew significantly in terms of sales in life insurance business, in the product Renta Flex and similar growth to that. And we paid significant commissions upfront. This explains probably 60% of the increase in Pacifico and the remaining is due to an accounting change that moves mainly from in-time recognition throughout the life of the policy.

The rest of increase was mainly in Mibanco who has basic capabilities also. For the next year, we expect that the efficiency ratio as a whole is going to maintain a similar level than 2018, because we are going to have overlapping capabilities increased in the transformational efforts. In BCP, more expenses in Mibanco and Pacifico and at the same time, we are very prudent maintaining the distribution capabilities.

Later on probably, we are going to reduce cost. Probably, I could give you one example. For example, in the reduction of branches that Francesca mentioned, we reduced a number of branches from the 125 first(ph) mentioned, but the cost structure was only equivalent to one-third because we translate the selling and distribution people to other branches. We're going monitor this very carefully and we feel comfortable that we're not going to sacrifice $1 of sales to save $0.20, of course, we're going to manage this cost accordingly.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Ernesto Gabilondo with Bank of America.

Ernesto Gabilondo -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Hi, good morning and thanks for the opportunity. Two questions from my side, The first one is a follow-up in terms of expenses. So can you repeat the expenses growth for this year? And given your transformation process, should we expect OpEx role to start going down after 2021. And my second question is after incorporating your 2019 guidance, if it's reasonable to expect net income to perform low to mid-teens growth? Thank you.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

We have a target base on cost-to-income, what we expect down the road is that the income is going to grow faster than the cost and as a result of that, we're going to improve efficiency.

Gianfranco Ferrari -- Deputy Chief Executive Officer & Head of Universal Banking

Just to add on -- this is Ferrari, just to add on Cesar's comment, as he mentioned before, at this time we're having sort of an overlap between the traditional distribution strategy with the new distribution strategy which Francesca mentioned early on. So what we foresee going forward is that at some point in time maybe the expenses of our digital world will stay stable. However, the operating cost in the traditional way of distribution is going to decrease. So overall, the aspiration we have at BCP and I stress the word, the word aspiration is to have a cost of income in (inaudible). However, we do see that it's achievable to be below 40 in three more years.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator instruction) Our next question comes from Andres Soto with Santander.

Andres Soto -- Santander -- Analyst

We saw a normalization in cost of risk this quarter, but are we going to remain below circa levels? This is due to a weak AI performance, increase in expenses and higher tax burden. I'd like to understand if these trends reflect a change in Mibanco's operating model as you're probably prioritizing growth in less profitable segments and employing people on the collection stage of the process. In the end, I would like to get a sense of what is the structural profitability that we can expect from Mibanco looking ahead? Thank you.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Okay. Thank you for your question. If you compare 2018 with 2017, (inaudible) Mibanco improved, it's a matter of the last quarter, basically Mibanco the portfolio quality deteriorated over the last actually two quarters. However, what we've seen in the new vintages, all of them are within bridge capital. Going forward in 2019 -- sorry, going back to 2018 as compared to '17, net cost to income in Mibanco, has improved dramatically and if you compare net cost of income to Mibanco's main competitor, it's significantly better than those of our competitors. Going forward, we do see a slight deterioration in cost to income, because you have to bear in mind that the Mibanco distribution model, which by the way we're not changing it yet, is based on people, or hiring people and training people. And therefore, the vintage of bringing in new people cost you a lot at the beginning. Since we expect to increase sales forces by 2019, there's going to be a short-term impact in this year.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jason Mollin with Scotiabank.

Jason Mollin -- Scotiabank -- Analyst

My first question is on the impairment charge that you mentioned, the Credicorp Capital. We saw this subsidiary go from a gain to a large loss. If you can quantify the charge? And what this was attributed to? And if we should see other charges like this in the future, if you're anticipating any others? Thank you.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. The impairment was for PEN 38 million. As we mentioned during the presentation, a key factor in this impairment was the increase in the discount rate and then in a lesser extent, adjustment in growth(ph) expectations. We don't envision an additional 'charge-off actually. We are confident with the book value levels at this point.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions). Our next question comes from Carlos Gomez with HSBC.

Carlos Gomez Lopez -- HSBC -- Analyst

Hello, good morning. I wonder if you could comment on the competitive landscape. In the past, you have mentioned how, in particular, in corporate you were seeing increasing competition. But now you're expecting higher margins for next year? Should we understand that competition has lessened somewhat? And if not, which areas do you see under more pressure? Thank you.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. Competition has been very harsh here, especially, in the corporate segment. Thus at that point in time, gross margins very low. However, the last quarter margins in that segment picked up. Having said that, I would say that we do see that the corporate business, a lot of our lending business, has gone up, and overall business where lending is the commodity side of the business. We make new market sharing in the lending side at that point in time. However, what we follow very tightly is our market share in terms of payments, savings, payrolls and things like that. The fee income businesses where we still gain market share. So even though, we see that maybe -- as a matter of fact, today we're seeing again competition in the corporate banking segment in terms of net interest margin. We see the business in an overall sense. If we go to the next level, to the midsized midmarket which gained market share, we had market gains last year, and at the same time, we improved the gain in that segment. So in the overall wholesale business, we basically are stable in terms of market share. And at the same time, improving NIM.

Gianfranco Ferrari -- Deputy Chief Executive Officer & Head of Universal Banking

This approach, I think, is very important because we have the lending business that enforces on the transactional services and they later are gaining relative importance with the time and it strengthened the relationship.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions). Our next question comes from Jason Mollin with Scotiabank.

Jason Mollin -- Scotiabank -- Analyst

Hi. I just wanted to understand better as a follow-up on the Credicorp Capital impairment. You mentioned the increase in discount rate and potentially -- and lower growth projections. What was this? Was this a project? Were these projects that you're analyzing? Or was it just -- what kind of assets were these? Or what kind of investment was this that you had to take the charge on?

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

If I understood well, now we have two different thinking that one data -- the business that we bought, we have goodwill in this business. So each year we measure the net production value with the current value. And we have a significant project to develop the wealth management business. The potential gains of this wealth management business has not been incorporated in the calculation that I mentioned previously. We see it as two different things for this regard.

Walter Bayly -- Chief Executive Officer

Hi. Jason. This is Walter Bayly. Being very specific what we have written down in the last quarter is related to the acquisition of IAF Trust achievement which has some remaining goodwill attached to the evaluation. And we have completely eliminated any remaining goodwill of that acquisition. As Cesar mentioned, the main reason for that was an increase in the discount rate of achieving an asset. We do not any further goodwill that can be impaired in Chile anymore with what (inaudible) over the past couple of years have required a certain level of yearly review and impairments. So this is done and overviewed and related specifically to one transaction, the acquisition of an investment bank focusing n each year.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Alonso Aramburu with BTG.

Alonso Aramburu -- BTG Pactua -- Analyst

Hi, good morning and thank you for the call. I wanted to follow up on the expenses questions. If we look at your guidance of loan growth, 8% to 10%, with margins improving between 15 and 45 basis points and stable efficiency. It would seem that expenses will grow double digits in 2019? So I'm just wondering if that's the ballpark figure that you have of expenses growth this year?

Walter Bayly -- Chief Executive Officer

The expenses are -- when we consider the NIM, we need to also the consider the other income, fee income, that growth is slightly below the pace of NIM. So, the expenses are going to grow similarly to the combined effect of the NIM and the other income.

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions). Our next question comes from Carlos Gomez with HSBC.

Carlos Gomez Lopez -- HSBC -- Analyst

Yes. Thank you again. And sorry to come back to expenses, but obviously, it is the focus here. Could you explain to us if you have a particular budget? If you have a certain amount that you're willing to spend in the transformation process? How long it's going to take one year, two years, five years, 10 years? And what are the key elements that take you from the current 44% cost to income ratio? It's expected mid-30s, it's a big, big change. So what are the keys? Is it the reduction in branches? Is it to increase electronically and what brings that from here to there? Thank you.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Just to be very specific, the mid-30 subdivision is at BCP level, not at Credit Card level. Probably, for the repo, at BCP level cost to income close (inaudible). We do have a plan on inventing the in digital and the overall being sold (inaudible) can help us -- should help us reduce the important way to the cost to income ratio. I don't know, Francesca, if it's ensured specifically but you can give them a flavor of how much we're spending on the deal approximately.

Francesca Raffo -- BCP

The way we look at the transformation expense, it's difficult to separate a few transformation to improving the way we search customers in a digital world. So the way we look at it -- about a third of the investment we have is related to making our current business better. And that's investing in technology, in channels et cetera. The other two-thirds is investing in disruptive technology, disruptive data process and so forth. And we do have budget we set a target annually, we discuss with the rest of the bank, the appetite that the bank wants to include in the transformation and we also set these engines that we talked about in the conference relating to engines focused on achieving cost reduction are also new income sources. The channels, i.e. the distribution channel, the IT engine, the data engine are very much focused on reducing the cost to profit and serve our customers.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Probably to add, we've announced framework to classify the costs and investment in run, grow and transform and we have the specific methodologies to approve project and to set up expectations for each of these categories.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Diego Lucio with Wells Fargo.

Diego Lucio -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

Hi. Thanks for the opportunity. My question comes from the funding cost. We have seen -- sorry, you said that there's going to be a pressure of margins because of competition at Mibanco. I want some guidance of funding cost by subsidiary for the next couple of years and also we have seen a reduction in the loan and deposit ratio in Mibanco for the quarter-over-quarter and year-over-year ratios, what's your guidance for the next year on this ratio? Thanks.

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

We don't provide specific guidance for these figures, but we can you give some comments. In general, we expect that the short-term rates are going to increase slightly at the end of the year and we are improving our funding structure both in BCP and in Mibanco. In the case of Mibanco, they are working actively in creating distribution and transactional capabilities. So they're going to improve the need probably at a higher rate pace than the previous years. As a result, they are probably going to improve the cost of funding but there are significant pressures in terms of interest rates, it's a very competitive market.

Walter Bayly -- Chief Executive Officer

Mainly just to compliment what Cesar just mentioned. At the Mibanco level, may be the most -- the weakest strategic part of the business at Mibanco is the funding structure and this comes from the previous Mibanco. Because Mibanco has most of the -- like the finest institutions get the bulk of their funding through the local capital market or professional investors. So Mibanco is investing on developing the whole transactional value proposition for their clients, so that they can get funding from those clients. You'll have to bear in mind that Mibanco already have 2 million clients. So we do see an opportunity to get a very low cost funding going forward. Obviously, in any retail business it's a long-term strategy.

Francesca Raffo -- BCP

The group itself had a a very big profit last year.

Walter Bayly -- Chief Executive Officer

Yes. But just to be specific, lower funding cost at Mibanco for last year was mainly because Mibanco have launched very successful campaigns for tangible profits. Going forward, what we're planning to do and what we're doing actually is to being a provider of the right value proposition in order to get trading account, current account, funds, which are even at lower costs.

Operator

Thank you. There are no additional questions at this time, I would like to now turn the conference back to Mr.Walter Bayly for closing remarks.

Walter Bayly -- Chief Executive Officer

Thank you very much, Stephanie. During 2018, the main characteristics were clearly an event of political volatility during the first half, it's not very often that we go through such level of political change without major disruptions in the economic side of the economy fortunately. We've also suffered mainly as a consequence of this political volatility, slow growth. Both of these events created a certain deterioration of the cost of risk particularly due to the sale and of Lava Jato at BCP. Some very specific issue at Mibanco, which have already been addressed. The fundamentals during this last quarter have been very encouraging. The result, nevertheless, has been impacted by an increase in operating expense. I think that has been well explained already. We are not concerned, but it is very important to give the market the confidence that we continue to have a very strict discipline in cost control.

After many years of a very successful efficiency program at BCP, we are probably going to lunch and going to a second stage of that, our cost discipline is a necessary item going forward and we have not lost, and we'll not lose that very strict discipline that has proven to be very successful for us in the past couple of years. And we believe and are confident that we are very well directed toward continuing to improve the efficiency ratio, particularly at BCP. As Gianfranco explained, at Mibanco on the other hand, we have decided to pursue further growth and expect to deteriorate somewhat our short-term efficiency ratio because of the expense of hiring and training sales force. We have already corrected the statistic risk issues and, again, are ready to pursue growth at Mibanco.

Overall, at Credicorp, we're confident that our short, medium and long-term strategies are well defined, well executed and have the appropriate confidence to monitor development, deviations and timely equations to market and technology developments. We continue to see growth opportunities in the markets in which we operate through the continued existence of our bank and bank segments of the populations and grow in the economies in which we operate. And we're very confident that our different subsidiaries and initiatives are very well-positioned to continue to capture the growth. We are optimistic regarding the future results of Credicorp both in the short and medium term.

With this, I really want to thank your continued presence in the conference calls and look forward to meeting you one-on-one and (inaudible) to be with you in the end of the results -- in showing of the results of the first quarter of this year. Thank you very much, and with this we finalize this conference call.

Operator

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's presentation and you may now disconnect.

Duration: 85 minutes

Call participants:

Cesar Rios -- Chief Financial Officer

Francesca Raffo -- BCP

Gabriel Nobrega -- Citi -- Analyst

Philip Finch -- UBS -- Analyst

Ernesto Gabilondo -- Bank of America -- Analyst

Gianfranco Ferrari -- Deputy Chief Executive Officer & Head of Universal Banking

Andres Soto -- Santander -- Analyst

Jason Mollin -- Scotiabank -- Analyst

Carlos Gomez Lopez -- HSBC -- Analyst

Walter Bayly -- Chief Executive Officer

Alonso Aramburu -- BTG Pactua -- Analyst

Diego Lucio -- Wells Fargo -- Analyst

More BAP analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.