Tuesday, March 31, 2015

How Powerball and Psychology Can Make You a Better Investor

If you weren't the lucky jackpot winner this weekend, don't be too upset. Sure, the Powerball lottery reached a whopping $600 million, the second-largest payout in U.S. lottery history. However, the odds of winning this record pot were about 1 in 175 million. With such a slim probability of winning, it's a wonder that anyone played at all. Yet thousands of people stood in line to purchase Powerball tickets ahead of the weekend draw -- buying around 80% of all possible lotto combinations, according to lottery officials.

With a record Powerball weekend now behind us, let's take a closer look at how understanding the lottery and psychology can make you a better investor.

Behavioral Finance 101
When investing in the stock market, the idea is to buy low and sell high. Yet our psychological biases can derail this truism -- making it harder for us to make smart investment decisions. In John R. Nofsinger's book The Psychology of Investing, the author explains how to identify and avoid such mistakes. Listed below are three of the most common psychological factors that can affect our financial decisions.

1. Overconfidence
Investors who are overconfident tend to trade their positions more frequently and thus underperform the market. "Interestingly, people are more overconfident when they feel they have control over the outcome -- even when this is clearly not the case," according to Nofsinger..

Consider this: Psychologists have found that "people who choose their own lottery numbers believe they have a better chance of winning than people who have numbers given to them at random" says Nofsinger. This means that choice can also give investors the illusion of having control, which in turn leads to overconfidence.

This is important to keep in mind, particularly if you're like me and invest using an online stockbroker, such as TD AMERITRADE. AMERITRADE and other discount brokers are great because they save you loads of money on otherwise costly commission and transaction fees. However, Nofsinger argues that it's easy to become overconfident when using online brokers since you're making your own decisions as to which stocks to buy and sell and when to do so.

2. Anchoring
This is a mistake made by both rookie investors and veterans alike. Too often investors "anchor" their perceived value of a stock to its past trading price -- and as a result missing out on future gains because they were waiting to buy in at the arbitrary price that they first anchored to. Fool analyst Dan Caplinger clearly explains the pits of anchoring in his article "The Huge Mistake Apple Investors are Making."

In the article, he cautions investors to "remember that fundamental events rather than arbitrary milestones are responsible for changes in the intrinsic value of the companies you invest in." Ultimately, investors should focus less on daily movements in stock price and more on the underlying business of the company in question.

3. Risk aversion
The rules of traditional finance have long said that people make rational decisions and are risk-averse. However, buying a lottery ticket directly contradicts this assumption. In fact, if you participated in the latest Powerball festivities, then you took on a risk-to-reward ratio of 1 to more than 175 million -- quite the opposite of risk-averse, if you ask me.

The level of risk you can handle often depends on your past investing experiences. Interestingly, studies show that investors are more likely to buy high-risk stocks after cashing out of a successful position. However, this doesn't make your gamble in the riskier stock more likely to earn you a return.

Why psychology matters
Understanding how these factors influence your investing can help you avoid making careless mistakes in the future. Sure, you may not get a sudden influx of millions of dollars like you would by beating the 1 in 175 million Powerball odds. However, your chances of generating market--beating returns for years on end are firmly within your reach. I'll take those odds any day.

Are you part of the 99%? The Motley Fool's free report highlights three less-than-luxurious stocks the 1% may be overlooking. Just click here to read it now.

Valspar Faces a Huge Test This Week

On Tuesday, Valspar (NYSE: VAL  ) will release its latest quarterly results. The key to making smart investment decisions on stocks reporting earnings is to anticipate how they'll do before they announce results, leaving you fully prepared to respond quickly to whatever inevitable surprises arise. That way, you'll be less likely to make an uninformed knee-jerk reaction to news that turns out to be exactly the wrong move.

Valspar is a major paint producer, and with the big rebound in housing prices, the company's stock has risen toward all-time record highs. But can demand truly deliver on the promise the soaring share price reflects? Let's take an early look at what's been happening with Valspar over the past quarter and what we're likely to see in its quarterly report.

Stats on Valspar

Analyst EPS Estimate

$0.90

Change From Year-Ago EPS

7.1%

Revenue Estimate

$1.05 billion

Change From Year-Ago Revenue

1.8%

Earnings Beats in Past 4 Quarters

3

Source: Yahoo! Finance.

Can Valspar's earnings rebound this quarter?
In recent months, analysts have gotten less optimistic about Valspar's earnings prospects, cutting more than a dime per share from their earnings-per-share consensus on the just-ended quarter as well as the full 2013 fiscal year. But the share price hasn't gotten hurt a bit, having rebounded to recover all of its losses following its previous quarterly report and an extra gain of about 1% since early February.

Players throughout the paint industry have seen their prospects rise in light of the housing recovery. In its most recent report, Sherwin-Williams (NYSE: SHW  ) posted record profits and sales for its first quarter, as net income rose 17%. Sherwin projected that revenue growth would likely accelerate during the rest of the year. Fellow competitor PPG Industries (NYSE: PPG  ) also managed to top earnings estimates in its quarterly report last month, although its sales didn't produce the increase that analysts had expected to see.

Yet Valspar hasn't taken improvement in the housing industry for granted. Early last month, the company announced an expanded paint program with home-improvement retailer Lowe's (NYSE: LOW  ) targeted at professional painters, seeking to compete both on price and service in providing custom tinting, color matching, and other useful services. That adds on to the new strategic relationship it implemented in January with Ace Hardware, in which Valspar bought Ace's paint-manufacturing assets and agreed to supply Ace-branded paint as well as its own brands for the hardware chain.

The big challenge for Valspar lies in its overseas markets. In last quarter's report, Valspar said that it continued to see weakness in demand from its international business, citing it as one of the main reasons for its cutting a nickel off its earnings guidance for the year. Still, the company expects to introduce paint to more than 300 locations in the U.K. and Ireland this year and generally sees international markets as promising.

In Valspar's quarterly report, be sure to compare the company's results against Sherwin-Williams and PPG as well as Valspar's own previous quarter. After having disappointed investors last quarter, Valspar needs to demonstrate its ability to move forward and take advantage of improving conditions in the industry.

The best investing approach is to choose great companies and stick with them for the long term. The Motley Fool's free report "3 Stocks That Will Help You Retire Rich" names stocks that could help you build long-term wealth and retire well, along with some winning wealth-building strategies that every investor should be aware of. Click here now to keep reading.

Click here to add Valspar to My Watchlist, which can find all of our Foolish analysis on it and all your other stocks.

Sunday, March 29, 2015

Yahoo! Designs Mail App for Tablet Users

Yahoo!  (NASDAQ: YHOO  ) has launched a full-screen Yahoo! Mail App designed specifically for iPad and Android tablets. 

Yahoo! says it has optimized the app to help users get through their emails quickly. Perhaps the biggest change is that users can simply swipe to delete, star, or move their emails. 

Of course, there are features that mimic the online experience. For example, the Yahoo! Mail app lets users group emails by sender. 

This announcement comes after CEO Marissa Mayer announced a newer version of Yahoo! Mail back in December. At that time, the company also noted that it was helping customers get through emails faster by creating a "consistent look and feel across devices," regardless of whether they were on the the Web or using a Windows, Android, or iOS product.

More Expert Advice from The Motley Fool
The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock in our brand-new free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." I invite you to take a copy, free for a limited time. Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

Friday, March 27, 2015

Can Merck Field a Psoriasis Blockbuster?

Targeting psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and other immune diseases has created some massive markets over the last decade. How massive? The market was sized up at an estimated $72.2 billion in 2010, according to BCC Research -- and growth isn't slowing any time soon. That's good news for patients, too. The pharmaceutical industry's fascination with an improved understanding of biologics has led to dozens of drugs that treat the underlying causes of diseases, rather than small molecules of years past that only treated symptoms.  

Few companies haven't joined the rush to develop biologics and novel small molecule classes to treat immune diseases. While some companies got a big head start over the field, next-generation therapies are being developed in pipelines across the industry. Merck (NYSE: MRK  ) is one company looking to capitalize on the trend and will shortly begin phase 3 trials on its leading psoriasis biologic therapy candidate. Going by the catchy pipeline name of MK-3222, the drug has huge potential if it ever receives approval from the Food and Drug Administration, or FDA.

About that competition I mentioned...
Older therapies aren't exactly losing their grasp on the markets they took by storm just yet. A quick look at 2012 sales data from the first three biologics approved that work by inhibiting the TNF-alpha protein -- integral to immune system communication -- shows exactly that.

Company

Drug

2012 Sales

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ  )

Remicade

$6,139 million

Amgen (NASDAQ: AMGN  )

Enbrel

$4,236 million

AbbVie

Humira

$9,265 million

Source: Company 2012 earnings.       

Aside from the big three, there are newer therapies on the market and in development that target TNF-alpha indirectly by inhibiting the proteins further upstream in the cellular communication chain. For instance, Johnson & Johnson's Stelara binds to interleukin 23 and interleukin 12, which regulate TNF-alpha production. The therapy has been approved for psoriasis and is in late stage trials for Crohn's disease and ankylosing spondylitis.

The biggest advantage for new therapies may lie in dosing schedules. Consider that during a 12-week study comparing Stelara to Enbrel, the TNF-alpha inhibitor was administered twice a week for the length of the study, while the drug candidate was administered just twice over the same period. Stelara still managed to beat Enbrel in high-dose groups with 71% and 49% of patients responding, respectively.   

Is it too late for Merck?
The dosing regimen of Stelara raises the bar significantly for all therapies. However, Merck's MK-3222 has essentially the same requirements; administered twice in the first four weeks of treatment and then once every 12 weeks thereafter. The two therapies work in slightly different ways, too, with MK-3222 targeting a different region of interleukin 23 while sparing interleukin 12. In theory, that could make the drug less destructive to a patient's immune system, which is the biggest drawback to many immune disease therapies.  

Two other biologics mirroring this mechanism of action are in development across big pharma. Johnson & Johnson's CNTO 136 (sirukumab) for rheumatoid arthritis is in phase 3 trials that are expected to be completed in early 2016. Amgen's AMG 139 for Crohn's disease is in a phase 1 trial that will wrap up in September. The good news from a competition standpoint is that each drug is targeting a different immune disease. The distant bad news is that expanding indications for each drug could be met with muted enthusiasm given the established competition that may exist (should each gain approval).      

Nonetheless, MK-3222 will be a first-in-class psoriasis option should it gain approval. It will be interesting to see how, if at all, the therapy improves upon Stelara by sparing interleukin 12. Several safety concerns have been specifically linked to agents that bind to the protein, according to Dr. Kim Papp of Probity Medical Research. Such therapies could potentially be a big step forward for patients and the industry.  

Can Merck beat the patent cliff?
Merck has a big hole to fill with Singulair expected to lose billions in sales in 2013 and new safety questions arising around its best-selling pharmaceutical Januvia. Therefore, it will be critical for new drugs to successfully make it out of the pipeline and onto the market. With that in mind, is Merck still a solid dividend play, or should investors be looking elsewhere? In a new premium research report on Merck, The Fool tackles all of the company's moving parts, its major market opportunities, and reasons to both buy and sell. To find out more click here to claim your copy today.

 

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Windstream Holdings Dividend: Will the REIT Spinoff and Reverse Stock Split Destroy Your Income?

After diving into Windstream Holdings' (NASDAQ: WIN  ) updated plans to spin off an asset-heavy real estate investment trust, I received an email from one of my readers. The reader -- let's call her Betty -- was concerned about what might happen to her generous Windstream dividends when the REIT spinoff takes place.

I'm thinking that other readers might share Betty's worries, so I'm here to address them for everyone.

Reverse splits
Let's start with Betty's biggest worry: What happens to Windstream's dividends when the stock goes through a reverse split?

"As a senior citizen dependent upon dividends, I'm concerned that Windstream's reverse split will dilute them. Windstream pays $1.00 a share which is the reason why I've kept it, all of these up-and-down years.

"What happens to the dividend after the reverse split? With fewer numbers, will the dividend become $2 a share, which doesn't seem likely, or will the dividend stay at $1, reducing my income by half?"

In general, stock splits and their reverse siblings normally don't affect your dividend payouts at all. For a real-world example of what I mean, let's look at IBM (NYSE: IBM  ) .

Way back in the spring of 1997, Big Blue paid out a dividend of $0.40 per share. This quarterly check went out on June 10, addressed to shareholders of record as of May 10.

On May 27, IBM shares went through a regular 2-for-1 stock split. IBM investors suddenly had twice as many shares. The next dividend payout was for $0.20 per share -- balancing the doubled share count against half the dividend payout per share.

The net effect to IBM's dividend yield and to each shareholder's final tally was zero. Share prices halved alongside the larger share count, keeping the effective dividend steady as well. And if you were used to $0.40 per share for a cache of 1,000 IBM shares, the new dividend payment was $0.20 per share on 2,000 stock certificates. Either way, you were looking at $400 per quarter.

The same thing happened again in 1999, when IBM's stock split again. Before the split, quarterly dividends had risen to $0.24 per share. That's $0.48 per share bought in early 1997. Afterward, the payouts dropped to $0.12 per share. That still worked out to exactly $0.48 per early 1997 share, or $480 for our hypothetical investor. The only difference was, the holding had risen from 1,000 shares to 4,000 stock certificates.

During this time, IBM's dividend yield fell dramatically -- but not because of the stock splits. Rather, the yield plunged because IBM's share prices kept rising in the preface to the dot-com crash in the early 2000s. And the effective dividend payouts climbed like clockwork:

IBM Dividend Chart

IBM Dividend data by YCharts

So, no, Windstream's reverse split won't affect Betty's payouts at all. These are mechanical exercises with very little effect on the real value of your investment.

The real difference-maker
What will change the payout, however, is that Windstream is splitting itself into two distinct businesses with separate stock tickers, and they will have very different dividend policies.

Current Windstream shareholders will keep their existing shares and also be awarded a "commensurate" (and probably equal) amount of shares in the new REIT operation. The stock is also slated to perform a 6-for-1 reverse split, most likely before the REIT spinoff.

Windstream is a longtime favorite of income investors. The REIT transaction will change how the payouts work, but the reverse stock split won't. Image source: Windstream.

I do have some bad news for Betty. When the REIT transaction is complete, Windstream expects the total dividend payouts between the two publicly traded stocks to add up to $0.70 per pre-REIT share. The REIT operation is expected to deliver annual dividends of $0.60 for each of the shares you hold today, and the service-oriented stock stops at $0.10 per current share.

This is not an effect of the reverse split, however. With only one-sixth as many shares in circulation, the payouts per share will also multiply by 6. No, it's simply how the dividend cookie crumbles under the new, two-company business plan. Some of the cash that goes into dividends today will be used to retire $4 billion of debt.

Moving forward, income-focused investors might want to consider selling their shares in Windstream's service-minded business and buying more of the dividend-focused REIT instead. All else being equal, that would actually increase the dividend-earning power of an investor's current Windstream investment to $1.20 per current share. The other stock might be more suitable for growth investors, with plans for only a small dividend policy.

Long story short
I hope that clears up how the reverse split affects Windstream's revamped dividend plan. To reiterate, the reverse split won't make a difference while the REIT spinoff changes the game in many ways -- including how the dividends will work.

Signing off, Betty asked for one more crucial bit of information: Where do you go to find out about dividend reductions, preferably before they happen?

There's no single point of contact for this sort of thing. Some companies announce their intention to slash dividend payments way ahead of time -- such as Windstream's upcoming reduction of total payouts per current share. Keep an eye on the company's investor relations site for an unfiltered and often overwhelming flood of information like this.

But that's kind of rare. In most cases, the company is under no obligation to keep investors abreast of future dividend plans, and tipping your hand like that could be seen as a competitive weakness.

Therefore, you often have to settle for informed guesses and estimates. For a bit more guidance, I'd recommend finding a media outlet that keeps close tabs on your favorite dividend stock. In the case of Windstream, I'd humbly suggest our own coverage here at The Motley Fool.

1 stock that could be the "Income Play of a Lifetime"
The Motley Fool's top analysts have uncovered a largely unknown way you can profit from the growth of wireless that could double your money on top of paying you a growing, LEGALLY GUARANTEED income stream every single quarter. To get the full story, simply click here.

Monday, March 23, 2015

Market Wrap: Stocks Rise Sharply to Finish a Dramatic Week

On the rocks edge Viktor Troyanov/Getty Images NEW YORK -- The stock market had another turbulent session Friday, capping off one of the more eventful weeks on Wall Street in years. The Dow Jones industrial average soared more than 250 points following strong earnings from Morgan Stanley (MS), General Electric (GE) and Textron (TXT) as well as some encouraging U.S. economic reports. It was the latest big move for a market which, with a few exceptions, has been on a mostly downward track. Stocks have had four weeks of declines, leaving the Standard & Poor's 500 index 6 percent below the record high it set Sept. 18. Investors have been riding wild market swings for much of the week. The Dow Jones industrial average plunged as much as 460 points Wednesday, then had one of its best days of the year on Friday. "We had indiscriminate selling all week, and then today we had indiscriminate buying," said Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at BMO Private Bank in Chicago. Market watchers have warned investors to expect more volatility than they have been used to in recent months, reflecting the heightened concerns about weaker growth in Europe and what it could mean for U.S. corporate profits, as well as plunging oil prices.

Most of the swings this week were related to fears about global growth and not about the fundamentals.

The turmoil has not been limited to the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Bonds, overseas stock markets and commodities prices have all had big moves this week. "Most of the swings this week were related to fears about global growth and not about the fundamentals of this market," said James Liu, global market strategist at JPMorgan Funds. The VIX, a measure of how much volatility investors expect in stocks, has risen from 12 in mid-September to as high as 31 this week, above its historical average of around 20. That's still far below the readings of 80 it had at the height of the 2008 financial crisis. "This volatility, in a way, is purely psychological. This is the market returning to a more normalized behavior," Liu said. The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) advanced 263.17 points, or 1.6 percent, to 16,380.41 Friday. The Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GPSC) rose 24 points, or 1.3 percent, to 1,886.76 and the Nasdaq composite (^IXIC) rose 41.05 points, or 1 percent, to 4,258.44. On Friday, investors rallied behind a group of corporate earnings results. General Electric (GE) rose 2.4 percent after the company reported third-quarter earnings that beat analysts' forecasts, citing improved performance in its aviation and oil and gas divisions. GE has a broad range of businesses that cover so many parts of the economy, from banking to building nuclear reactors, that investors see its results as a bellwether for how U.S. industry is doing. GE rose 57 cents to $24.82. Textron (TXT), another industrial conglomerate, had the second-biggest gain in the S&P 500 index after its own earnings came in far ahead of what analysts were expecting. Textron rose $2.99, or 9 percent, to $36.65. Overall, the S&P 500's industrial sector rose nearly 2 percent, making it the best performing part of the market. Next week will be one of the busiest periods for Wall Street this earnings season. A total of 130 companies in the S&P 500 index will report quarterly results next week, including big names like American Express (AXP), Cola-Cola (KO), AT&T (T) and IBM (IBM). Investors also had two pieces of positive economic data to work through. A survey by the University of Michigan showed consumer sentiment unexpectedly rose last month to 86.4, much higher than the 84.3 expected by economists. It was the highest reading for that survey since July 2007, right before the Great Recession. The Commerce Department reported that construction firms broke ground on more apartment complexes in September, up 6.3 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.017 million homes. Homebuilders rose on the news. Hovnanian Enterprises (HOV) gained 21 cents, or 6 percent, to $3.71 and Beazer Homes (BZH) rose 72 cents, or 4 percent, to $17.71. On Friday, oil prices rose slightly, but were still down 4 percent for the week on prospects of lower demand from a slowing global economy and high supplies. Benchmark U.S. crude rose 5 cents to close at $82.75 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Brent crude, a benchmark for international oils used by many U.S. refineries, rose 34 cents to close at $86.16 on the ICE Futures exchange in London. In other energy futures trading on the NYMEX, wholesale gasoline rose 2.2 cents to close at $2.233 a gallon, heating oil rose 2.8 cents to close at $2.498 a gallon and natural gas fell 3 cents to close at $3.766 per 1,000 cubic feet The price of gold fell $2.20 to $1,239 an ounce, silver fell 11 cents to $17.33 an ounce and copper rose two cents to $3 a pound. What to Watch Monday:

Saturday, March 21, 2015

What You Need to Know Before Buying Vivint Solar's IPO

Vivint Solar has patiently waited to go public and now that SolarCity (NASDAQ: SCTY  ) has done the dirty work educating the market on solar and the market is near all-time highs, it's time to cash in. Blackstone Group, whose affiliate owns Vivint Solar, recently filed an updated S-1 that proposed raising as much as $426 million in Vivint's IPO, valuing the company at $1.9 billion.

The question for investors is: Will this be the next SolarCity, which is up 368% since its IPO, or just another overhyped stock? Before Vivint Solar hits the market, let's take a closer look at what the company is.

Residential solar systems built by SunPower. Image source: SunPower.

What you need to know
Vivint Solar is a residential solar installer and has a lot of similarities to SolarCity, the market leader in residential solar, but also some key differences. It's from that baseline that I'll look at the company.

Both companies primarily sell residential solar-power systems through long-term leases, capturing value by financing and owning the systems themselves. This allows them to use scale to sell and install systems, lowering costs for themselves and consumers.

Image source: Vivint Solar.

There are also some key differences in how Vivint Solar and SolarCity go about their businesses. SolarCity is constantly vertically integrating its business, buying racking maker Zep Solar and solar panel manufacturer Silevo, among other acquisitions. Vivint has maintained close supply relationships with a small number of suppliers like Enphase Energy, which is its sole inverter supplier. This allows Vivint to standardize components, but it doesn't pull the product entirely into its business. Essentially, SolarCity is trying to own the entire supply chain and Vivint is specializing in sales, installation, and financing.

Sales strategies also differ between Vivint Solar and most of its competitors. Vivint Solar uses a similar direct sales strategy as its parent company, going door-to-door selling solar-power systems. This concentrates installations into small regions of the country like Massachusetts, where Vivint Solar is the market share leader. It has also resulted in a lot of turnover in the sales staff with 43% of workers leaving between the beginning and end of 2013.

Another key to understand is that Vivint Solar and SolarCity have only recently begun crossing paths in the markets they serve. Vivint Solar started expanding its business on the East Coast while SolarCity began serving the West Coast. From that perspective, competition between the companies has been low, something that will be interesting to watch as they grow across the country. 

SolarCity workers install a residential solar system. Image source: SolarCity.

Can Vivint Solar upset the solar industry?
Vivint Solar has built up a 9% market share in the residential solar market in a little over two years, which is an incredibly fast pace. It is also gaining steam, more than doubling installations in the first half of this year to 56.8 megawatts. With an addressable market of over 91 million homes, or about 456 gigawatts given an average system size of 5 kW, the residential solar industry is just getting started. Given the fact that it only has strong roots in six states it could expand quickly across the country.

For investors, the Vivint Solar IPO isn't a slam dunk, especially if the $1.9 billion market cap holds. SolarCity's market cap has fallen to $5.7 billion and would be a safer bet given its scale and cost structure. The company also lost $56.3 million last year and another $69.2 million this year, and the retained value model it is pushing has a long way to go to prove long-term profitability.

But the opportunity in solar is immense and Vivint Solar is just getting started. I think a basket approach to the industry is wise with other leaders like SolarCity, SunPower, and First Solar included in your portfolio, but Vivint Solar should be considered among the industry leaders, and it'll be a big player in this industry for years to come. 

Apple Watch revealed: The real winner is inside
Apple recently revealed the product of its secret-development "dream team" -- Apple Watch. The secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its everyday impact could trump the iPod, iPhone, and the iPad. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see where the real money is to be made, just click here!

Thursday, March 19, 2015

1,000 Days and Counting: How Long Can the Bull Market Last?

Dow Jones Passes 17,000 For The First Time Andrew Burton/Getty Images One thousand days and counting. That's how long it's been since the Standard & Poor's 500 index (^GPSC) suffered a correction. That means the S&P 500 hasn't suffered a 10 percent drop from its recent high level mark since October of 2011. What does that mean for investors? Should they take their profits now, or does this long-running bull market have more room to maneuver? One thousand days is a long time for the bull market to run without interruption, but it's not unprecedented, and it doesn't necessarily mean another correction is right around the corner. The bull market of the 1990s ran for 2,553 days without a correction. "When the market does something unusual it is a good idea to be on your guard," said Hugh Johnson, chairman of the Albany, New York-based money management firm Hugh Johnson Advisors. "For the market to have performed as well as it has without a significant correction is pretty unusual," said Johnson, "but I'm not doing anything about it." Most analysts say the 1,000 day mark isn't significant in their fundamental analysis of the market, but they acknowledge that it is psychologically important for investors. The current streak is double the average span without a 10 percent pullback. About one year after the current bull market began in 2009, there was 16 percent correction in 2010. The most recent correction came in 2011, when the market slumped by a steep 19.9 percent, and there was a close call in 2012 when it fell 9.9 percent. According the Stock Trader's Almanac, the average bull market includes two periods of correction, so the current rally isn't unusual in that regard. Many market pros and anxious investors have been anticipating another correction for quite some time, but the market has continued to plow ahead, setting record after record. So far this year, the S&P 500 has rung up 25 record highs, the latest one coming on Thursday. It went into the 3-day weekend just shy of the unprecedented 2,000 level. In addition, the Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI) topped the 17,000 mark for the first time. That means if you invested in an S&P index fund back when the current bull run began in March of 2009 -- and not traded in and out of that position -- you would have nearly tripled your investment. But Howard Silverblatt, senior index analyst at S&P Dow Jones Indices, says the current bull "gets no respect." The financial media -- in print and on TV -- is filled with gloom and doom forecasts. A recent Wall Street Journal headline proclaimed "Some See Clouds Forming," while some market prognosticators warn that a market collapse is just around the corner. They contend the market cycle has run its course, that the market is way overvalued when you examine corporate profits and other key measures, and that unrest in the Middle East, Ukraine and other hot spots could explode. But most forecasters say that unless there is a major economic crisis (which seems very unlikely after the recent string of upbeat economic data) or a geo-political catastrophe, then the current bull market is likely to continue into next year. Jeffrey Hirsch, editor of the Stock Trader's Almanac, studies historical trends in the market. He expects stocks to trade sideways or retreat a bit during the usual "summer doldrums" of July and August, and then resume their advance later this year and into next year. "I don't see the market rolling over until 2016," said Hirsch, noting that presidential election years "tend to be horrible." Johnson, the veteran money manager who has helped guide investors through many bull and bear market cycles, says he is "on guard" but not worried at this point. He says the market hasn't been overrun by widespread optimism. "You don't run for cover, but you can build some defenses into your portfolio." If you're worried about a downturn, he says you can sell economically sensitive stocks like housing, and buy safer issues like utilities and household product stocks. Many analysts even say a market correction, which is inevitable at some point, is healthy for the long term bull to continue. It gets stocks from levels that are seen as slightly overvalued back into a more fairly priced range. And as Johnson notes, that would provide for "more upside potential with better buying opportunities."

Monday, March 16, 2015

Number of millionaires reaches record in 2013

high net worth, millionaires, wealth

As the economy continues to climb, so does the number of millionaire investors in the world.

Individuals with investible assets of more than $1 million grew by 15% in 2013, while combined wealth grew by almost 14% to reach a record high of $56.6 trillion, according to the World Wealth Report 2014 released by Capgemini and RBC Wealth Management.

North America’s high-net-worth population expanded by 16% to 4.33 million in 2013, while Asia’s grew by 17% to reach 4.32 million — with growth in the Asia-Pacific region narrowing North America’s lead to less than 10,000 individuals. In Asia, people in the high-net-worth category saw their wealth increase by 18% to $14.2 trillion last year, while the same category in North America saw an increase in wealth of 17% to $14.9 trillion.

“Overall, 2013 was another strong year for the high-net-worth market, with surging equity markets and improving economies contri

Back to Politics

Print Friendly

Focused investors rightly try to tune out the political back-and-forth. But because of Tuesday’s lopsided defeat of U.S. House of Representatives majority leader Eric Cantor by a “nobody” in a primary, we now must turn our attention back to the odious machinations in our nation’s capital.

The challenge is to assess longer-term implications without giving in to short-term over-analysis. Cantor’s primary loss was the first ever for a House majority leader going back to that position’s 1899 creation. The victor is David Brat, a political novice and economics professor. I see three clear explanations/examples for Cantor’s defeat:

#1: Cantor’s Virginia Congressional district was redrawn in 2010. It was “gerrymandered.” This means manipulating voting districts to a political party’s advantage, and it’s increasingly common across the nation. In Cantor’s district, some heavily Democratic precincts in the Richmond area were exchanged for more rural, Republican areas. This was supposed to make Cantor’s seat even safer from Democrats than before. Surprise: The real threat would come from disgruntled Republicans.

#2: Cantor was clueless. On primary day itself, he started off at a Capitol Hill Starbucks, holding his monthly fund-raising coffee with lobbyists. In the late afternoon, he finally headed down to Richmond for his expected victory party. Cantor should have been back in his district, particularly considering numerous warning signs that had sprung up about his overconfident yet failing re-election campaign.

Cantor’s inadequate attention to the primary reflects the core reason he was defeated. It wasn’t because of a single issue, such as a possibly overly favorable stance towards immigration reform. He was spending too much time on the national front, furthering his political ambitions while taking money ! from Wall Street and Silicon Valley. Voters resented Cantor's national aspirations and felt he neglected his district.

"The Republican Party has been paying way too much attention to Wall Street and not enough attention to Main Street," Brat said after he defeated Cantor. Earlier this month, Brat promised to "fight to end crony capitalist programs that benefit the rich and powerful." 

#3: Cantor’s primary campaign gave his opponent much-needed name recognition. Cantor spent more than $5 million to lose a Congressional primary for a “safe seat.” Brat spent about $200,000.

Cantor is said to have spent almost that much, $168,637, at steakhouses alone since the beginning of last year. “I can’t think of any case in which the incumbent’s spending advantage was so huge and he still lost,” said one political scientist.

Plus, the money was poorly spent. Cantor blanketed his district with more than 1,000 television ads. Not only did Cantor not bother to talk directly to voters in many of them. Worse, the attack ads often mentioned Brat by name and showed his picture. This is how voters learned that Brat even existed and was a viable alternative. Free publicity that Brat himself couldn’t buy!

What It Means

Democrats may chortle at Cantor’s ouster, but it will only increase Republicans’  unwillingness to work with them. As of now, it looks like more – and worse – gridlock for at least the rest of this year and maybe the rest of Obama's presidency.

This doesn’t just mean his political agenda, such as immigration reform, is diminished even further. It also raises new doubts about Washington's ability to conduct even the most basic functions of government. These could prove difficult because of fear that any hint of bipartisan cooperation will encourage a primary challenge.

As of now, it also could mean another ugly battle over funding the government and a bruising federal debt-c! eiling fi! ght in March 2015, like the one that rattled financial markets in the summer of 2011. Fiscal restraint, lower deficits and rejecting anything that’s not paid for now is viewed as an increasingly important principle in the Republican-controlled House.

The Republican Party establishment was beginning to believe it had finally eliminated the tea party as a major threat. That is now not the case. "Republican members of the Senate and House are going to be extraordinarily skittish about taking risks," said one expert. "All it takes is one high-profile crash and nobody wants to fly on airplanes for a while, and that's what happened."

Yet this doesn’t signal a new anti-incumbent wave, at least not yet. So far this year, 26 states have held their primaries to determine the nominees for 257 House seats. Of the 229 incumbents running again, only Cantor and one other have lost.

The U.S. historically is a centrist nation, although the blue-red divide has increased dramatically in recent years. If Republicans move further to the right, it will make future political control more difficult for them to achieve. Of course, the same challenge could develop for Democrats if they move further to the left. The race to the bottom continues.

Some say Cantor could run for Congress as an independent. As a former major figure (he has resigned his majority leader post), the reasoning goes, he possibly could gain enough support from mainstream Republicans, independent voters and even some Democrats.

Meanwhile, the Democratic and Republican candidates for Cantor’s seat have a few things in common. Both have no previous political experience. And both are professors at Randolph-Macon College in Ashland, Va., where they are teammates on a faculty basketball team.


Thursday, March 12, 2015

The Tax Rules of Mutual Funds

Print Friendly

Mutual funds seem easy, and most investors believe they understand funds. But the income tax rules for funds are more involved than many people realize. Knowing the nuances of the rules is important. Taking different actions or changing their timing could improve your after-tax returns by a significant amount and preserve more of your nest egg.

Let's take a quick trip through some key parts of the tax code to learn ways to increase your after-tax returns from mutual funds. Of course, what we're going to discuss in this visit applies to mutual funds held in taxable accounts, not to funds held in qualified retirement plans, such as 401(k)s, traditional IRAs, and Roth IRAs.

The basic rule to understand is a mutual fund itself generally isn't taxed on its income or gains. To avoid taxes, each year a mutual fund has to pay out and pass through to its shareholders most of its net interest, dividends, and capital gains. You as the shareholder are taxed on your share of these items.

While this rule prevents double taxation of the investment returns, it sometimes causes problems. Your share of the income is determined by your ownership on the day the distribution is made. That results in the inequity of a shareholder purchasing shares of a mutual fund the day before a distribution and being taxed on the full amount of the distribution.

Example. Max Profits buys 1000 shares of a mutual fund on Dec. 29 for $15 per share. On Dec. 30 the fund makes its annual distribution of net capital gains and dividends realized for the year, amounting to $5 per share. This reduces the value of Max's shares by $5. He also has to include the $5 in his income for the year, though in his case it really is a return of his investment.

The first tax rule of mutual funds is don't invest in a fund just before a distribution. Most funds indicate their scheduled distribution dates on their web sites and to anyone who ! calls and asks. You need to be especially wary of making investments near the end of the calendar year and each calendar quarter. Income funds, such as bond funds, tend to make distributions at the end of each month.

When you are caught in this situation, an option is to sell the fund shares right after the distribution. In the example, Max Profits' tax basis in the shares still will be his purchase price of $15 per share, and their net asset value after the distribution will be $10. He can sell right away and have a $5 loss. Of course, this isn't a perfect solution. There might be transaction costs if he invested through a broker, and the fund might have a redemption fee for short-term holders. Plus, there's the value of Max's time.

Also, under the wash sale rules Max can't immediately buy back the fund shares if he wants to deduct the loss. He has to wait more than 30 days. In that time, the fund's share price might have moved significantly higher.

Avoid these problems. Avoid month-end fund purchases and check a fund's distribution schedule before making a purchase.

Buying the wrong mutual funds can prevent you from receiving the full benefit of tax-deferred compounding of investment returns. This is another effect of the way a fund passes through income and gains to shareholders.

Before choosing a fund, you should examine the turnover rate, or the rate at which it buys and sells investments. A fund with 100% turnover sells its entire portfolio and purchases other investments within a year.

The turnover rate is important because a fund distributes only its realized capital gains and other investment income. A stock fund with low turnover buys stocks and holds them for a long time, or at least longer than a year. As the stock appreciates, it is not selling the stock to realize the gains, and doesn't have to distribute its paper gains to shareholders. The fund shareholder can continue to own the fund shares, watch them appreciate, and not have to pay t! axes on t! he gains until he sells the fund shares.

But a fund with high turnover does a lot of buying and selling during the year. It realizes a lot of its capital gains and has to distribute them to shareholders. The share-holders have to include the distributed gains in their income for the year and lose the opportunity to let the gains compound tax-deferred.

Suppose two mutual funds have identical returns over time. But one is a low-turnover fund that makes few distributions to shareholders. The other is a high-turnover fund that distributes over half its annual return to shareholders. After a few years, the shareholders in the low turnover fund will be much better off. Their gains compound without being reduced by taxes each year, and when they sell the fund shares the gains will be taxed at favorable long-term capital gains rates.

Most published mutual fund returns generally are pre-tax. You can find after-tax returns for hypothetical shareholders in a fund's prospectus and in some services and web sites.

There's another downside to high turnover funds. Most of their gains tend to be short-term capital gains, because they held the shares for one year or less. When a mutual fund has long-term capital gains that it distributes, shareholders report these as long-term capital gains on their tax returns. But a fund's distributed short-term capital gains are reported as ordinary income on shareholders' tax returns. They are taxed at the shareholder's maximum marginal tax rate, plus they aren't offset by any capital losses the shareholder has.

The second tax rule of mutual funds is to avoid funds that have high-turnover ratios or a history of distributing a high percentage of their annual returns. If you must purchase such funds, do it through a tax-advantaged account such as an IRA.

For some, the solution is to own only passive or index mutual funds. That's generally a good solution, but it's not fool proof. All index funds are not the same. While Vanguard and ot! her mutua! l fund families work hard to keep expenses very low on their index funds, not all fund companies do. In addition, some funds track indexes not by purchasing the individual stocks but by using futures or options for at least part of their portfolios. These can create less favorable tax consequences.

The third tax rule of mutual funds is to examine index funds just as carefully as active funds before investing. Check expenses, distribution histories, and performance relative to the index. You'll find a surpris-ingly wide variation, especially for indexes other than large company stock indexes such as the S&P 500.

When you're a passive or index fund investor, you also should consider exchange-traded funds as well as traditional open-end mutual funds. Exchange-traded funds are able to use a few tricks to keep their expenses even lower than most open-end mutual funds. In addition, ETFs can use some tax strategies not available to open-end mutual funds.

The fourth tax rule of mutual funds is to compare open-end mutual funds and ETFs when considering an index or passive strategy.

Mutual funds don't pass through their realized losses. When a fund sells an investment at a loss, the loss can offset gains realized during the year and reduce the gains passed through to shareholders. A good fund manager takes this into consideration and will look for losses in its portfolio that can be taken to offset any gains it realizes. When a fund's losses exceed its gains during the year, as happened to most funds during 2008, the losses are carried forward and can offset future gains. That can enhance the attractiveness of a fund that's been down. It might be a value and turnaround opportunity, plus it could have carryforward losses to offset future gains.

The fifth tax rule of mutual funds is to check the prospectus for loss carryforwards.

Reinvesting fund distributions makes life easy, at first, but creates problems later. Shareholders still are taxed on the distributions, e! ven if th! ey don't receive the cash. But that's not the real problem.

Each time a distribution is reinvested, your basis in the new shares is their value on that date. Most people go for years holding a fund and reinvesting distributions. They have a bunch of shares bought at different times and different prices. When they're ready to make partial sales of their holdings to fund retirement, they have a complicated tax picture. They have to determine the tax basis and holding period of the shares sold.

The sixth tax rule of mutual funds is to avoid automatic reinvestment of distributions. Instead, let distributions accumulate in a money market fund. Then, use the account to rebalance your portfolio by purchasing new shares in funds that have lagged the others.

When you sell fund shares you need to know three things: the net sale price, the tax basis, and the holding period. Finding the last two items can be difficult when you've owned a fund for years, made a series of investments, and had distributions reinvested.

The IRS issued regulations in 2008 to make this easier. The fund family or broker has to report your cost basis and whether the gain is long-term or short-term. But the calculations are required only for mutual funds purchased in 2012 and later years. Some funds voluntarily report the amounts for shares purchased in earlier years. Also, the fund family or broker can choose how to compute the cost basis, and most use the average cost method.

But you can choose another method to compute the basis for your sale. For example, you can specifically identify the shares being sold. That allows you to choose the shares that have the highest basis and therefore the lowest capital gain. Or if you have a capital loss, you can choose the shares with the highest capital gain so that it is offset by the loss.

But to change the cost basis that is reported, you have to notify the broker or mutual fund in writing before the sale. The financial firm chooses the format in which y! ou have t! o make the writing. 

The seventh tax rule of mutual funds is to plan your sales. When you're selling a portion of your holdings, you can choose which shares are being sold in order to achieve the best tax results. But you have to work with the broker or mutual fund firm to ensure the firm reports the basis you want.

When the broker or fund issues the Form 1099 after the year, review it carefully right away. Your tax return has to match it. If the form is incorrect, you have to notify the financial firm and have a corrected version issued.

Tuesday, March 10, 2015

Ask an Expert: What business are you in?

Q: I own a small retail business and do my job just as well as the next guy, but the deal is that the next guy has a lot more business than I do. Specifically, a competitor of mine down the street always seems to be much busier than I am. I have sent friends in to see what he does differently and all they report is that he schmoozes them up really well. It has to be more than that though. Any ideas on what I can do? --Mark

A: I have a question for you, for all of us really: Do you know what business you are in?

Yes, I know what you are thinking – what kind of dopey question is that? Of course you know what business you are in. If you own a car wash, you are in the car cleaning business. If you are a chiropractor, you are in the healing business. Right?

Wrong.

Let me suggest that no matter what your answer is, it should be, "I am in the customer satisfaction business." And the difference between the business that gets that and the one that doesn't probably is the difference between the business that has more customers than it knows what to do with and the one that is struggling to keep the doors open.

Indeed, no matter what your business is, if you are not hyper-focused on customer satisfaction, it is probably safe to assume that you are likely having a tough time.

There is no shortage of surveys that seek to list those companies that have great, and poor, customer service. But no matter which survey you look at, the list of companies that offer top-notch customer service vary very little. Typically, you will see listed companies such as

NordstromCostcoAmazonChick-Fil-A Hyatt

What is also noticeable about this list is that these are considered not only some of the best businesses in the country, but companies that have incredibly loyal followings. And that's the point. By thrilling (yes, thrilling) your current customers, you put yourself way ahead of the game. Current customers are far more likely to keep buying from you, they worry less about prices and! they have a tendency to spread the gospel via word of mouth. Additionally, stressing great customer service sets you apart from the crowd, makes getting new customers far easier, builds your brand and thus bolsters the bottom line. Truly happy customers become evangelists for your business.

That's the value of understanding that you are in the customer satisfaction business.

The other thing to notice about the list above is that each of these companies stress customer service in different ways. Nordstrom is famous for its return policy. Amazon makes buying quick and easy, "1-click" even. Hyatt works hard to give you exactly what you expect from a nice hotel – friendly staff, clean comfortable rooms, amenities, ease. Type 'Hyatt' and 'great customer service' into your browser and you will see scores of rave Trip Advisor reviews.

Or consider Chick-Fil-A. According to Fast Company, "Every year Chick-Fil-A spends more than a $1 million evaluating its service. In addition to traditional focus groups, the company conducts a quarterly phone survey with customers from each restaurant. The 20 or so questions focus on four factors that most affect loyalty according to Chick-Fil-A research: taste, speed, attentiveness and courteousness, and cleanliness.

"Each location then receives a two-page report detailing how it's doing in each area and how it compares to the chain's top performers. In other words, what's working and what needs improving."

So the question is, how can you up your customer service? You can offer freebies to customers, "schmooze them up", do more than they expect, ask them how you can better serve them, better serve them – the list is endless.

Whatever the case, just know that once you do that, they too will get what business you are really in – the service business.

Today's tip: One way to treat customers well is to stay in touch with them and offer them special deals, valuable info, new promotions and more, via email. I have long been an evangel! ist for e! mail newsletters & marketing, and recently I was given a tour of the cool new email marketing product from Vertical Response (a company I do some work with). It certainly makes staying in touch easy and affordable.

What I liked best about the tool is that is combines email marketing and social media into one fast, easy-to-use interface. With drag-and-drop capabilities and lots of intuitive templates, Vertical Response's mobile-friendly e-newsletter/social media tool is also free for small businesses with lists under 1,000, and very affordable with those who have bigger lists. Steve says check it out.

Steve Strauss is a lawyer specializing in small business and entrepreneurship. Email him at sstrauss@mrallbiz.com. His website is TheSelfEmployed.

Monday, March 9, 2015

Can rebounding stocks keep rebounding?

In the world of Wall Street chart-watching, stock market rebounds after major pullbacks are not all created equal.

We bring this public service announcement to you because the current market rebound from its Feb.3 low is currently under the microscope on Wall Street, but the jury is still out on whether this recovery has legs or is a merely a fake-out.

Some market bounces have staying power. Others do not.

There are "oversold bounces," which occur after stocks are pounded into submission in a short time span and then reverse course. These quick pops tend to be fleeting and often end prematurely, leaving bulls unsatisfied and forcing them to confront the prospect of a stock market transitioning from an uptrend to a downtrend.

TRACK YOUR STOCKS: Get real-time quotes with our free Portfolio Tracker

There are also "breakout" rallies, which not only erase all the losses from the preceding pullback, but also catapult major stock indexes like the Dow Jones industrial average and the Standard & Poor's 500 to new record highs.

Whether the recent rally turns out to be just an oversold bounce, or the start of a move to new highs, remains to be seen. The big challenge for indexes like the Dow is that a record high closing level often acts like a price ceiling. And it's not always easy for prices to break out above old peaks.

All investors can do now is watch to see if the major indexes are successful in making new highs, or if they fail. Failure would be a bearish development.

Sunday, March 8, 2015

North Korean Economy By The Numbers--Too Tiny To Matter

North Korea has been in the headlines, heavily in recent days as the No.2 leader, Jang Song Thaek, was executed by his nephew Kim Jong Un–the current No.1 of the isolated country. Before that, the concern the country might or might not have long-range missiles or might or might have nuclear weapons kept it on the front pages for months. What is not mentioned terribly often is the size of the North Korean economy and what a major disruption of that economy would mean to the rest of the world.

According to the CIA World Factbook, North Korea has almost no economy at all. GDP (based on purchasing power parity) is pegged at $40 billion, and has not changed for three years. These numbers are barely reliable. The CIA has to turn to private estimates which in turn are based on information from the OECD). However, if the CIA numbers are close to correct, North Korea’s economy does not make it into the top 100 in the world based on GDP, and perhaps not much larger than Haiti’s.

Annual exports from North Korea are only $4.7 billion. As might be expected, two-third of this goes to China, the only ally the smaller country has. A great deal of what North Korea’s economy produces is almost certainly consumed internally. Unfortunately this is not mostly by the nation’s population. The military is probably the largest “customer” of North Korean production.

The most honest evaluation of the North Korean is from the Heritage Foundation:

North Korea is largely isolated and disengaged from the world's economy. Data collection is extremely challenging, and reported statistics on the economy remain largely speculative, requiring careful evaluation. North Korea's economic freedom score is 1.5, making its economy the least free in the 2013 Index.

However, apparently the “careful evaluation” cannot be done.

 

 

 

 

Saturday, March 7, 2015

5 Stocks Under $10 Moving Higher

DELAFIELD, Wis. (Stockpickr) -- At Stockpickr, we track daily portfolios of stocks that are the biggest percentage gainers and the biggest percentage losers.

>>5 Big Trades to Take in December

Stocks that are making large moves like these are favorites among short-term traders because they can jump into these names and try to capture some of that massive volatility. Stocks that are making big-percentage moves either up or down are usually in play because their sector is becoming attractive or they have a major fundamental catalyst such as a recent earnings release. Sometimes stocks making big moves have been hit with an analyst upgrade or an analyst downgrade.

Regardless of the reason behind it, when a stock makes a large-percentage move, it is often just the start of a new major trend -- a trend that can lead to huge profits. If you time your trade correctly, combining technical indicators with fundamental trends, discipline and sound money management, you will be well on your way to investment success.

>>5 Stocks Insiders Love Right Now

With that in mind, let's take a closer look at a several stocks under $10 that are making large moves to the upside today.

Supernus Pharmaceuticals

Supernus Pharmaceuticals (SUPN) is a specialty pharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing products for the treatment of central nervous system, or CNS, diseases. This stock closed up 1.8% to $7.27 in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $6.92-$7.31

52-Week Range: $4.45-$8.40

Thursday's Volume: 510,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 531,994

From a technical perspective, SUPN spiked modestly higher here right off its 50-day moving average of $6.94 with decent upside volume. This move is quickly pushing shares of SUPN within range of triggering a big breakout trade. That trade will hit if SUPN manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance levels at $7.40 to $7.49, and then once it clears more resistance at $7.70 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in SUPN as long as it's trending above its 50-day at $6.94 or above more near-term support at $6.77 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 531,994 shares. If that breakout hits soon, then SUPN will set up to re-test or possibly take out its 52-week high at $8.40.

NII Holdings

NII Holdings (NIHD) provides wireless communication services under the NextelTM brand, targeted at meeting the needs of subscribers who use its services to improve the productivity of their businesses. This stock closed up 7.8% to $2.48 in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $2.28-$2.52

52-Week Range: $2.14-$9.82

Thursday's Volume: 5.14 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 4.50 million

From a technical perspective, NIHD spiked sharply higher here right above its 52-week low of $2.14 with strong upside volume. This stock has been dowtrending badly for the last three months, with shares plunging from its high of $7.50 to its low of $2.14. During that move, shares of NIHD have been consistently making lower highs and lower lows, which is bearish technical price action. That move has pushed shares of NIHD into oversold territory, since its current relative strength index reading is near 30. Oversold can always get more oversold, but this bounce higher on Thursday could be signaling that NIHD is ready to rebound sharply higher.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in NIHD as long as it's trending above Thursday's low of $2.28 and then once it sustains a move or close above Thursday's high of $2.52 to some more near-term overhead resistance at $2.63 with volume that hits near or above 4.50 million shares. If we get that move soon, then NIHD could rebound sharply higher towards $3.50 to $3.80.

Orion Energy Systems

Orion Energy Systems (OESX) manufactures and implements energy management systems consisting primarily of commercial interior and exterior lighting systems, controls, power data management and cloud-based data storage and related services. This stock closed up 5.3% to $6.15 in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $5.77-$6.20

52-Week Range: $1.12-$6.71

Thursday's Volume: 88,000

Three-Month Average Volume: 177,681

From a technical perspective, OESX spiked sharply higher here right above some near-term support at $5.61 with lighter-than-average volume. This stock recently formed a double bottom chart pattern at $5.71 to $5.61. Shares of OESX have now started to rebound off those support levels and it's quickly moving within range of triggering a big breakout trade. That trade will hit if OESX manages to take out some near-term overhead resistance levels at $6.50 to $6.64, and then once it clears its 52-week high at $6.71 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in OESX as long as it's trending above support at $5.61 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 177,681 shares. If that breakout hits soon, then OESX will set up to enter new 52-week-high territory, which is bullish technical price action. Some possible upside targets off that breakout are $9 to $10.

Document Security Systems

Document Security Systems (DDS) is engaged in fraud and counterfeit protection for all forms of printed documents and digital information. It holds numerous patents for optical deterrent technologies that provide protection of printed information. This stock closed up 5.7% to $2.03 in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $1.87-$2.11

52-Week Range: $0.86-$3.64

Thursday's Volume: 1.63 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 877,945

From a technical perspective, DSS spiked sharply higher here right off its 200-day moving average of $1.90 with heavy upside volume. This stock has been uptrending strong for the last month and change, with shares soaring higher from its low of 86 cents per share to its high of $2.30. During that move, shares of DSS have been making mostly higher lows and higher highs, which is bullish technical price action. That move has now pushed shares of DSS within range of triggering a major breakout trade. That trade will hit if DSS manages to take out Thursday's high of $2.11 to some more near-term overhead resistance at $2.30 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in DSS as long as it's trending above its 200-day at $1.90 or above more near-term support at $1.79 and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 877,945 shares. If that breakout hits soon, then DSS will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $3 to $3.20.

Organovo Holdings

Organovo Holdings (ONVO) is a three-dimensional biology company focused on delivering breakthrough bioprinting technology and creating tissue on demand for research and medical applications. This stock closed up 4.4% to $9.63 in Thursday's trading session.

Thursday's Range: $9.04-$9.99

52-Week Range: $2.00-$13.65

Thursday's Volume: 5.35 million

Three-Month Average Volume: 5.05 million

From a technical perspective, ONVO bounced sharply higher here right off some near-term support at $9 with above-average volume. This stock recently pulled back sharply from its 52-week high at $13.65 to its low of $7.93. Shares of ONVO have started to rebound off that $7.93 low with the stock tagging an intraday high on Thursday of $9.99. That rebound is starting to push shares of ONVO within range of triggering a big breakout trade. That trade will hit if ONVO manages to take out Thursday's high of $9.99 to some more near-term overhead resistance at $10.05 with high volume.

Traders should now look for long-biased trades in ONVO as long as it's trending above some near-term support at $9 or above $8.40, and then once it sustains a move or close above those breakout levels with volume that hits near or above 5.05 million shares. If that breakout hits soon, then ONVO will set up to re-test or possibly take out its next major overhead resistance levels at $12.50 to its 52-week high at $13.65.

To see more stocks that are making notable moves higher today, check out the Stocks Under $10 Moving Higher portfolio on Stockpickr.

-- Written by Roberto Pedone in Delafield, Wis.


RELATED LINKS:



>>3 Stocks Breaking Out on Big Volume



>>5 Health Care Stocks Ready to Cut You a Dividend Check



>>5 Stocks Set to Soar on Bullish Earnings

Follow Stockpickr on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook.

At the time of publication, author had no positions in stocks mentioned.

Roberto Pedone, based out of Delafield, Wis., is an independent trader who focuses on technical analysis for small- and large-cap stocks, options, futures, commodities and currencies. Roberto studied international business at the Milwaukee School of Engineering, and he spent a year overseas studying business in Lubeck, Germany. His work has appeared on financial outlets including

CNBC.com and Forbes.com. You can follow Pedone on Twitter at www.twitter.com/zerosum24 or @zerosum24.


Thursday, March 5, 2015

U.K. Seeks Eurostar Sale After Doubling Asset-Disposal Target

Britain plans to sell its 40 percent stake in Channel Tunnel express train operator Eurostar Group Ltd. as it seeks to improve transport links and raise billions of pounds from asset disposals after paring state spending.

Talks about a sale are taking place with other investors in Eurostar, which is majority owned by France, the Department for Transport said after the plan was revealed by the Treasury under a 375 billion-pound ($510 billion) infrastructure program.

Eurostar, whose core routes link London with Paris and Brussels, carried 9.9 million passengers last year and doubled its operating profit to 52.3 million pounds. The company is seeking growth through the addition of further European destinations, while facing competition from Deutsche Bahn AG, Europe's biggest rail operator, which plans London services.

"It is for the U.K. government to decide on its plan for its shareholding in Eurostar," the train company said today in a statement. "Our focus is on looking after our customers, expanding to new destinations and growing the business."

The disposal is included in a refreshed version of the U.K. National Infrastructure Plan, which details public and private-sector projects to 2030 and beyond, the Treasury said.

Insurance companies including Prudential Plc (PRU) and Aviva Plc (AV/) will invest 25 billion pounds as part of that plan, which covers projects from energy to communications. No decision has been taken on the timing of the Eurostar sale, which is being pursued after the doubling of a target for the sale of state corporate and financial assets to 20 billion pounds, a DfT official said.

Amsterdam Route

The U.K. is the No. 2 shareholder in Eurostar, with the French government holding 55 percent via state rail company SNCF. Belgium railway SNCB owns the rest.

The disposal plan comes as Eurostar gears up for its biggest expansion in years, with new e320 trains ordered from Siemens AG (SIE) due to link London with Amsterdam from December 2016, with stops in Antwerp, Rotterdam and Schiphol airport.

At the same time it faces new competition as Deutsche Bahn plans services from Germany to London via the Channel Tunnel from 2016 after a three-year safety study, Groupe Eurotunnel SA (GET), which runs the 30-mile subsea link, said in June.

Eurostar is also seeking more transfer customers as the addition of direct trains to Lyon, Avignon and Aix-en-Provence showcases options for using its routes in long-distance trips.

The company aims to expand beyond tunnel services through a joint bid with the Keolis unit of SNCF, or Societe Nationale des Chemins de Fer Francais, for the right to operate the U.K.'s East Coast link between London and Edinburgh.

The U.K. move to exit the Eurostar stake is part of a wider government drive to raise cash as it pares state spending and seeks to shift more companies out of public hands ownership.

An initial public offering of 360-year-old postal service Royal Mail (RMG) Plc raised 1.7 billion pounds.